Michael Shashoua: Basel III’s Fault Lines

Page 2

Page 2
Page 2

Michael Shashoua: Basel III’s Fault Lines

Page 2

Slower growth exacerbates unemployment and reduces tax revenues in all jurisdictions. In addition, Basel III imposes greater requirements on foreign exchange, specifically liquidity rules that hadn’t previously existed in that market, says Virginie O’Shea, senior analyst at consultancy Aite Group. “What impact will that have, when we’re suffering through such a terrible climate economically?” she asks.

Not many major markets have published final rules for implementing Basel III yet. Those that have include Australia, China, India, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Switzerland. Those that haven’t, however, include Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Italy, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, the UK, the US, and the EU as a whole. Turkey and Argentina have not yet even published draft regulations for Basel III.

Reluctance
Different European nations’ regulators and public officials have been reluctant to back Basel III out of concern that it will damage their local banking industries, according to O’Shea. So these nations, and Europe as a whole, have insisted on reviewing the details of Basel III before assenting, she says. Ventura adds that it’s “unlikely that the global community will rally around the cause to make it a priority anytime soon.”

The flaws of Basel III itself are most evident in its “one size fits all” approach to capital holdings, O’Shea says. “They don’t understand the effect on liquidity that will have if it forces people to hold liquidity buffers,” she says, explaining that this means holding greater amounts of collateral to support clearing operations, which will have to be taken from asset pools and liquidity that firms would prefer to use elsewhere. “This could end up driving people out of business.”

Since Basel II took many years to gain acceptance, it wouldn’t be surprising if Basel III took an equal amount of time. The Committee chairman’s exhortation to markets to make the deadline may itself lack teeth since he admitted in nearly the same breath that not all jurisdictions may be ready. But the real question is whether the delay will produce rules that are done right or congeal the rulemaking momentum.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T

Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here