Regulation Webcast: Risk and Reward
TOPICS COVERED BY THE WEBCAST:
- The ways in which firms are challenged by the frequency of new regulation, and the number of different directions it is coming from, along with short timeframes for compliance.
- The role of technology in managing this global reform, from swaps reform through to market surveillance and other areas.
- Managing the risk of regulatory arbitrage, and debating questions over more harmonized approaches to global regulation.
- How vendors, institutions and regulators can work more closely with one another to reduce the risks inherent in non-compliance, particularly in fragmented regulatory environments such as the ones international firms operate in.
On a global basis, financial firms are being buffeted by the winds of change. The US financial sector is experiencing the widest reform since the Great Depression on the back of the Dodd–Frank Act, while those operating in Europe are dealing with the review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II). For international firms, questions of managing reform and the potential for regulatory arbitrage present significant challenges to the way in which they operate, as borne out by discussions in a recent Waters webcast, which explored the ways in which businesses can navigate the intensity of regulation after the financial crisis of 2008.
Moderated by James Rundle, deputy editor, sell side, of Waters, panelists included Nick Green, head of fixed-income markets e-business at Crédit Agricole; Alan Eddie, head of risk IT Americas, global head of regulatory risk and operational risk IT at RBS; Bill Nosal, head of business development and product strategy for Smarts Broker at Nasdaq OMX; and Ed Royan, COO at AxiomSL, EMEA.
Risk Elements
Although the primary objective of macro-regulation such as Dodd–Frank and Mifid II is the reduction of systemic risk, panelists debated the question of whether this new landscape, and both the frequency and direction of new regulation, were actually introducing new elements of risk, given the stiff penalties for breaches and the often short timeframes in which to ensure compliance.
“The scale of reform we’re seeing across the world is without precedent. Just look at Dodd–Frank, a prime example of large-scale reform,” RBS’ Eddie says. “It’s always risky, and particularly so when the whole industry has to do it at the same time—it’s not just one firm that has to change.”
“The scale of reform we’re seeing across the world is without precedent. Just look at Dodd–Frank, a prime example of large-scale reform. It’s always risky, and particularly so when the whole industry has to do it at the same time – it’s not just one firm that has to change.” Alan Eddie, RBS
According to Eddie, simply keeping track of what regulation was coming from where, and when regulators expected compliance, was a significant challenge. Others say this was mainly a capacity problem, and although the immediate commercial benefits of increasing compliance capacity aren’t readily apparent, some firms are actively exploring ways in which their compliance procedures and ability to adapt to regulation can be a competitive differentiator.
Carrot and Stick
The panelists say that although the burden of regulatory change is relentless, there are some benefits. Requirements under Dodd–Frank for certain institutions to centrally clear interest-rate swaps on March 11, for instance, went smoothly in part due to vendors having their systems in place to handle the new method of trading, while other regulatory reforms around derivatives transactions potentially offer new areas of growth.
“There is risk inherent in the scale and the pace of the change,” says Crédit Agricole’s Green. “But on the other hand, there are opportunities. Central clearing gives a tremendous opportunity for many of the dealers to expand the range of clients they deal with, and by reducing the risk between the counterparties, it gives the potential for that asset class to be used a lot more extensively and to be a lot more attractive to users over time.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher