Michael Shashoua: Confounding Interests
The developments in the saga of the legal entity identifier (LEI) continue to yield surprises. I wrote in March that coordinating the LEI with other identifiers could make it more effective and give it a smoother path to implementation. The latest changes in LEI governance and data management make it clear that path will remain rocky because differences between national LEI standards persist.
The significance of the Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC), administrator of the global LEI standard, setting out new principles in late July for pre-local operating units (LOUs), cannot be overstated. The rules forced the US pre-LOU, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, with its CFTC Interim Compliant Identifier (CICI), to scrap 20 percent of its pre-LEI registrations, removing them from the utility administered by Swift and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC).
So, the LEI continues to meet global resistance—in this case from the global regulatory body disallowing registrations that were not made by the entity itself or with the entity’s permission. The rationale for instituting the LEI was to be able to track securities and their ownership, so only being able to do so with the permission of the company whose shares are at issue, defeats the functionality of the identifier.
The Special Relationship
The UK and the US—perhaps with a “special relationship” when it comes to the LEI—are responding with the same tack to the international resistance. The London Stock Exchange, which is issuing the UK’s pre-LEI, the Interim Entity Identifier (IEI), says the IEI will comply with ROC guidelines and will allow for portability of pre-LEI records between LOUs (or pre-LOUs).
The US Treasury’s Office of Financial Research (OFR) has proposed an interim system that would make pre-LEIs from any LOU compatible for reporting worldwide. Since these allied nations couldn’t beat the others into accepting their identifier standard, they now propose to join them in devising the standard and implementing it the way the rest of the world wants.
In June 2012, the FSB and the CFTC were batting responsibility for the LEI standard back and forth, like kids in a sandbox.
States and Confusion
This state of affairs leaves it to outside registries to coordinate and consolidate the growing number of types of pre-LEIs—from the US, Germany, France and most recently the UK, with more countries expected to follow. A consortium of independent organizations including GS1, the Corporation for National Research Initiatives, FIX Protocol and consultancy Tahoe Blue, is running P-lei.org, an LEI distribution project that aims to put all the pre-LEIs into a consistent format. It’s curious, to say the least, that this consortium is the body now doing the real work of keeping LEIs organized and consistent, rather than the ROC or its Central Operating Unit. Matters will become more complex as more countries come up with their own pre-LEIs, a scenario that appears increasingly likely.
Looking back over the past two years of the LEI implementation process doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence in the discrepancies being sorted out. Last December, the Financial Stability Board (FSB), which later created ROC to handle the LEI, started to recognize concerns about LOUs duplicating LEIs, and creating inconsistencies. But two-thirds of 2013 have now passed, and the same challenge still exists.
In June 2012, the FSB and the US CFTC were batting responsibility for the LEI standard back and forth, like kids in a sandbox. The CFTC launched its CICI identifier with statements that something had to be done because the FSB hadn’t completed a workable standard. The ROC has struck back, forcing the CFTC into a “do-over.”
Considering all this, it appears that the serious business of getting a workable and consistent identifier to track securities and financial transactions is being managed more like a playground battle, and suffering from political turf wars. Perhaps it’s time to call a “time out” so that everyone can think it over?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher