Max Bowie: How Mifid II Will Drive Co-Lo Growth
![max-bowie max-bowie](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/807/101807/max-bowie-incisivemedia-color.jpg.webp?h=ee12d8fd&itok=FIjEj0Li)
US regulators are scrutinizing high-frequency trading, including supporting services and technologies, such as co-location. But, says Max, the US’s regulatory drive to move OTC assets onto exchange-style platforms—and the expansion of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive in Europe—will actually contribute to more demand for co-location services.
When the European Commission unveiled the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid) in 2007, it transformed European equities trading, spawned multilateral trading facilities, and caused trading to fragment, creating a wealth of new data and demands for a US-style consolidated tape to re-aggregate this fragmented data.
Now, Mifid II includes proposals for consolidated tapes. However, while the Consolidated Tape Association provides consolidated quote and trade data from fragmented US markets, any European tapes will provide trade data only, still requiring firms to source quote data in the same manner as before to meet many of Mifid’s requirements.
Mifid II will also extend the regulation to asset classes beyond equities, and contribute to the forces driving bonds and derivatives onto exchanges or centrally-cleared, exchange-like platforms, such as European bond trading platform Galaxy MTF, and the swap execution facilities (SEFs) being created in the US to move OTC asset classes onto centrally-cleared venues. And there’s certainly evidence of demand to trade assets like fixed income on exchanges: Third quarter turnover in Börse Berlin’s bonds trading segment increased by 183 percent over Q3 last year.
Participants in Inside Market Data’s recent Fixed Income report agree that more fixed-income trading will move onto centrally-cleared electronic platforms, which will reduce the risk of OTC trading and increase trading and data volumes—but are not necessarily convinced that moving assets onto exchange platforms will automatically create more demand or better-quality data especially if clearing costs make it prohibitive for firms to trade OTC assets and liquidity moves elsewhere.
However, such a move is expected to create more demand for market and historical data, which Celent senior analyst Anshuman Jaswal says has been a barrier to adoption of algorithmic trading in the fixed-income markets, along with a lack of streaming prices, since most fixed-income platforms use a request-for-quote model, rather than an order-driven marketplace—though European bond-trading platform MTS is launching a platform for corporate bonds trading that will operate on a transparent, order-driven model.
As such platforms come to market, we can expect to see a frenzy of activity among providers of co-location centers where these new venues will host their trading engines. Many equity and derivative markets have already moved their core technology out of their main buildings into large datacenters—either their own or third-party-operated—and in June, FiberMedia SVP of sales John Panzica told me that the hosting provider will specifically target the growing SEF market.
But like Mifid, the datacenter marketplace is also undergoing a period of major change and expansion. Private equity firm Abry Partners’ recent acquisition of datacenter and infrastructure provider Xand Corp. is the latest in a string of deals—including CenturyLink’s purchase of Savvis for $2.5 billion in April and the buyout of co-location and hosting center provider Telx by Abry and Berkshire Partners—that reflect how valuable these facilities have become to the modern data industry and markets as the world grows increasingly globalized and interconnected.
Access to Liquidity
As trading congeals around these massive co-location centers—either third-party or exchange-owned—these intermediaries will play a key role in providing access between the fragmented liquidity pools.
And now, providers who have had success in low-latency co-location and infrastructure markets in North America and Europe are looking for new sources of revenue, and are turning their attention to the Asia-Pacific region, which is still largely dominated by a few local players and domestic exchange groups. However, as new venues such as Chi-X Australia enter the fray and threaten to fragment trading in individual markets and the region as a whole, demand is likely to increase for more co-location and proximity hosting centers to provide intermediate points between multiple venues to support cross-market strategies—just as the regulatory moves in Europe and the US will stimulate datacenter growth of their own.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Northern Trust offers internal fund accounting, data tools to clients
Regulations and a mandate to enhance quality and transparency in a bid to improve the investor experience are pushing buy-side firms to have more oversight of their third-party providers.
EU firms press for faster move to T+1 after smooth US rollout
Following the example set by North America, 70% of attendees at a European hearing on shorter settlement cycles favored a Q4 2027 switch to next-day settlement.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.