Tine Thoresen: Are We in ‘Postfach’ Now?
If it is true that you burn around 13 calories from laughing for 10 minutes, I think my data friends in Zurich will, if possible, be even fitter after I visited them this month. And it’s all because of business entity data.
Since there is a lack of a unique international standard for addresses, I misunderstood the company address, and thought I was in “Postfach,” when in fact, Postfach is not a place name at all—it means “post box” in Swiss German. In the Swiss address I was looking at, “post box” was on the line where the place name would have been in my UK address.
This age-old problem of standardization is one of the things that is wreaking havoc in the data world. We keep hearing frustrated data managers asking: “How difficult can it be?” But it is still yet to be fixed.
Financial services is not the only industry that could benefit—the most obvious beneficiary would perhaps be postal services, and there are already a number of activities outside the financial information world geared toward solving the standardization problem.
In fact, 191 countries are members of the Universal Postal Union (UPU), which was established in 1874, making it one of the world’s oldest international organizations. One of the UPU’s many activities is developing address standards, and the organization offers a web-based look-up tool for postal addressing systems.
The fact that the UPU has existed for more than 100 years, yet there is still a need for country templates for address standards, appears to indicate that standardizing addresses can indeed be difficult.
For the financial industry, it might sound like agreeing on a standard for addresses would just be a case of large institutions coming together, but if it had been an easy process I think it would have been done by someone outside the financial industry a long time ago.
Utility or Futility?
What the financial industry can do though, is agree on using the address standards developed by the UPU for business entity data records. This is something that would have been easier if there were a global industry utility of this data, as the industry utility could then perhaps be linked to a country look-up tool similar to the one available on the UPU website. If the utility could guarantee standardized addresses by validating that the addresses had been written correctly, the set-up could help ensure data consistency.
I have seen a bank in the UK offer a link like this to the UK postal service organization, Royal Mail, and it must be possible to do the same for an industry utility on an international basis.
If a utility such as this were to become a reality, it would at least ensure that smaller firms—some of which may struggle to allocate sufficient resources dedicated to sourcing and maintaining business entity data—could also have a set-up that would perhaps previously only have been seen at institutions with mature data management practices.
But in essence, standardization of international addresses should not be seen as an issue that the financial services industry could go out and fix on its own. Regulators are putting pressure on firms to get the data right, but many data elements touch on other industries too, and it is not up to the financial services industry to change the world.
In my opinion, the best that the financial services industry can do is to ensure that all players in the market are on the same page—and when it comes to addresses, it seems that page has to be the UPU postal addressing systems page.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Insurance: The role of risktech in effectively managing emerging risks and driving competitive edge
This whitepaper covers the global survey, conducted by Chartis Research and TCS, of banking, financial services and insurance firms, which found that insurers are struggling to adapt to evolving risks and regulatory requirement increases. Chartis offers…
FX automation key to post-T+1 success, say custodians
Custody banks saw uptick in demand for automated FX execution to tackle T+1 challenges.
Observations and lessons to learn from the move to T+1
The next few years will see other jurisdictions around the world look to North America for guidance on transitioning to shorter settlement cycles.
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
In 2025, keep reference data weird
The SEC, ESMA, CFTC and other acronyms provided the drama in reference data this year, including in crypto.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 299: ACA Group’s Carlo di Florio
Carlo di Florio joins the podcast to discuss regulations.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.