Reading the Basel Tea Leaves
Months after the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision extended the timeline for compliance with Basel III capital adequacy requirements into phases running through 2019, the committee is now starting to fill in some of the gaps in the rules.
This week, the committee re-emerged with proposals on leverage ratios, collateral and derivatives exposures. Other than a concrete minimum of 3% for leverage ratios, which the committee is testing, the proposals are short on numbers and long on complex verbiage and formulas for determining aspects of capital adequacy.
Although the complexity of the language in these proposed Basel III provisions could conceal loopholes that legal experts might be more likely to find, a layman's reading uncovers statements that firms may not net collateral against derivatives exposures and must increase the calculations of their exposure based on how much collateral is in derivatives.
This appears to be an about-face—if not in scope, at least in temperament—from the committee's actions in January, when it allowed more types of securities to be counted as liquid assets and lowered thresholds for depositor exits.
What is the Basel Committee up to? The latest action apears to take a harder line on what can be counted toward capital adequacy. Its guidance in January on liquidity coverage ratios leaned toward leniency.
Watching from afar, these developments remind a US observer of the classic TV game show "To Tell The Truth." To play on that show's signature moment—will the real Basel Committee please stand up?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Northern Trust offers internal fund accounting, data tools to clients
Regulations and a mandate to enhance quality and transparency in a bid to improve the investor experience are pushing buy-side firms to have more oversight of their third-party providers.
EU firms press for faster move to T+1 after smooth US rollout
Following the example set by North America, 70% of attendees at a European hearing on shorter settlement cycles favored a Q4 2027 switch to next-day settlement.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.