August 2012: Armageddon? What Armageddon?
As we entered the fourth quarter of last year, many across our industry anticipated 2012 to be the year of regulatory Armageddon. The consensus was that the next 12 months would usher in a veritable flood of new, far-reaching and potentially disruptive regulations that would have even the most on-the-ball compliance officers in a tail spin. This was borne out during the CIOs’ panel discussion at the 2011 Waters USA event, where panelists estimated that as much as 40 to 50 percent of their total IT budgets would be consumed by regulatory projects.
But everyone was wrong. Sure, we have witnessed the introduction of Form PF in the US, the forthcoming European Securities and Markets Authority’s central counterparty clearing rules, and the Legal Entity Identification for Financial Contracts standard, although the latter two regulations fit more neatly into the “industry development” pigeon hole than that labeled “costly, disruptive and generally painful regulation.”
So it’s fair to say that from a regulatory perspective, 2012 has so far amounted to nothing resembling regulatory Armageddon. The principal reason for this year’s regulatory damp squib is the US presidential election. It has always been the case that the incumbent US president—supported by his political party, and, in many instances by large sections of the upper and lower houses—looks to defer any potentially unpopular legislation, so as not to shoot himself in the foot and by so doing scupper his re-election chances. A cynic might argue—with tongue firmly planted in cheek—that the Twenty-second Amendment was created expressly to ensure that presidents could serve a maximum of two terms only, thus ensuring that at least some bills have a half-decent chance of seeing the light of day, albeit only in non-presidential election years.
But all this year’s Capitol Hill navel gazing doesn’t mean that Dodd–Frank is going anywhere soon—it’s just that for the time being, more important things have taken precedence. But next year and 2014 will be different, that’s for sure. It’s unlikely we’ll ever witness a regulatory “Big Bang” where the industry’s regulators work in league and unleash Armageddon—they’re too savvy for that, and, given the amount of regulatory push-back the industry has shown over the past decade, regulators have learned to manage their battle plans one fight at a time.
Instead, new rules will be drip-fed into the industry, stealthily closing loopholes and ratcheting tight the regulatory framework, in a manner analogous to the boiling frog anecdote: the water temperature will slowly rise, the frog will not be alarmed, but the result will be the same—boiled frog.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher