James Rundle: The Devil in the Details
![james-rundle james-rundle](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/765/194765/james-rundle-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=KSqZWuPJ)
Regulators have been in the headlines for many reasons lately, and not all of them encouraging. The final deadline for the acceptance of comments on the Volcker Rule banning prop trading, for instance, generated a flurry of comment pieces, themselves generated by the flurry of comments received at the eleventh hour.
To call the response to Volcker a flurry underestimates the sheer scale of the comments received by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). I spoke with a former New York Fed staff attorney shortly after the deadline, who said that the regulators had received around 15,000 separate pieces of comment, and not all of them were the standard 10 to 20 pages long. The submission by interest group Occupy the SEC, for instance, was 350 pages long. The problem with working through high-profile rules such as the Volcker Rule, though, doesn’t just come from balancing political will with public opinion. As the lawyer pointed out, the regulators also have to deal with each other—in this case, five separate bodies—and form a cohesive arrangement among disparate interests.
Time Flies
Volcker is provisionally scheduled to take effect on July 21—an ambitious timeframe to sift through the sentiment received, and implement any final regulation. Stress points have come not only from US-resident banks, which claim it will be impossible to put effective technological and operational systems for compliance in place by then, but also by extraterritorial entities that are challenging what they see as an overextension of legislative power by the US. Canadian banks are worried that their non-US operations will now be subjected to oversight by a foreign regulator, and some are concerned that Volcker, in its present form, will contravene previous intra-sovereign treaties such as the North American Free Trade Agreement.
The regulators have to be seen to move quickly while still taking into consideration the complexity of the financial services industry and any unintended consequences. They also have to balance the fact that technology development, such as what has facilitated the growth and reach of tier-one banks, continues apace, and unless stringent deadlines are set for enactment and compliance, there’s no guarantee of efficacy.
Rules of Engagement
The criticism of supervisory authorities is that they cannot understand that complexity, as they don’t live and breathe the world of capital markets on a day-to-day basis. A hard-and-fast definition of high-frequency trading (HFT), for instance, still eludes many, and results in excessive lobbying and stalling over rules to rein it in.
Sell-side firms need to look at their infrastructure at a granular level, such as their data operations, and prepare for change.
This is slowly set to change, though. The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has established a subcommittee to look at HFT and algorithmic trading with the express purpose of defining it, as a precursor to regulatory movement. Governmental studies such as those from the UK’s Foresight group, and the Swedish regulatory body Finansinspektionen about the practice are beginning to develop a more mature view of what HFT entails, and its relationship to both liquidity and market stability. Regulators are becoming more conversant, informed, and efficient in their rulemaking as well as their understanding of the arcane arts.
The global financial services community may all seek to postpone or eliminate Volcker and similar regulations, but it’s clear that the regulators are moving ahead. Indeed, they have to, or risk it becoming irrelevant before it’s even finalized. The industry should aim to be more anticipatory than reactionary—it’s simply not going to go away, and regulators are becoming more adept at keeping pace. Sell-side firms need to take the time they have to look at their infrastructure at a granular level, such as their data operations, and prepare for change. Implementing technology changes for segregation and even outright separation takes time, which is in short supply these days.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher