Michael Shashoua: AMQP Is Standards’ Latest Challenger
The recent launch of the Advanced Messaging Queuing Protocol adds another contender to the field of several messaging protocols for financial services. Michael considers the attributes of the newest entrant and what it means for true standardization in the industry.
A defining conflict for the financial services industry as it heads into 2012 will be determining which of many messaging standards and protocols should prevail—or whether there needs to be a decisive choice among them in the first place.
This year’s Sibos conference was dominated by discussion of legal entity identifiers (LEIs), expected to be implemented in 2012 at the behest of the US Treasury’s Office of Financial Research, and also expected to eventually spread worldwide as a standard for identifying securities. Sibos also saw ongoing efforts to promote adoption of the ISO 20022 and Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) standards.
Initial Frenzy
Add to the competing field of messaging standards the following acronyms and initialisms: FIX, FIXML, FpML, FAST, TCP and UDP. (I guess FIXML would be part acronym and part initialism, because you pronounce part of it as a word, and the rest as letters—see the “Cheerleaders” episode of Penn & Teller’s entertaining Showtime cable TV series for a discourse on this, referring to a tangle of names of scholastic cheerleading administrative organizations).
Last month saw the addition of one more, the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol or AMQP 1.0, whose developers say it will simplify trading communications, and interactions between risk management systems, as well as reduce the number of destinations a firm has to reach with messages. Hanno Klein, a senior vice president at Deutsche Börse, says AMQP also improves trade confirmation messages and organization of information on trades.
AMQP’s developers sought to meet criteria of applicability, interoperability, manageability and ubiquity, according to Robert Godfrey, a vice president at JPMorgan Chase who works on an integration services team advising and supporting on deployments of AMQP technology at the firm. “AMQP has to be everywhere,” he says. “When people say messaging, they should think of AMQP.”
Everything in Its Place
Although the industry might like to have one all-encompassing universal messaging and identification standard, akin to a universal power plug or outlet, according to Klein’s analogy he provided attendees at the AMQP launch event, there appears to be distinct needs served by each acronym-named standard, which he acknowledges.
“One has to be realistic about what we can do with standards and how fast we can change the community,” says Klein. “We started in settlement with Swift, ISO 15022 and now 20022 messages. We do a lot with FIX protocol—FIXML being XML syntax for FIX. FpML is more for the over-the-counter (OTC) space where it’s about describing very complex products, which are actually contracts between parties. We use FAST in market data for bulk data on order books, trades, reference data and the like for trading.”
So, can the financial industry be like electrical power outlets when it comes to standards—accommodating multiple formats within one universal framework (if that’s enabled by adapters), or should it be more like the governance of internet addresses, regulated worldwide by ICANN in the form of IP addresses?
That depends on the securities industry’s ability to produce a code or set of standards that could include every one of the aforementioned formats and connect them seamlessly together. The performance of AMQP will determine whether it can be that ubiquitous umbrella, or at least pave the way to the interoperability its developers envision.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Cusip Global Services wants to know, ‘What’s your damage?’
The evidence and discovery phase of the case against the identifier bureau is set to expire in March, bringing an anticipated jury trial one step closer.
Big questions linger as DORA compliance approaches
The major EU regulation will go live tomorrow. Outstanding clarifications and confusion around the definition of an ICT service, penetration testing, subcontracting, and more remain.
Insurance: The role of risktech in effectively managing emerging risks and driving competitive edge
This whitepaper covers the global survey, conducted by Chartis Research and TCS, of banking, financial services and insurance firms, which found that insurers are struggling to adapt to evolving risks and regulatory requirement increases. Chartis offers…
FX automation key to post-T+1 success, say custodians
Custody banks saw uptick in demand for automated FX execution to tackle T+1 challenges.
Observations and lessons to learn from the move to T+1
The next few years will see other jurisdictions around the world look to North America for guidance on transitioning to shorter settlement cycles.
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
In 2025, keep reference data weird
The SEC, ESMA, CFTC and other acronyms provided the drama in reference data this year, including in crypto.