Michael Shashoua: The Long View
![michael-shashoua-waters michael-shashoua-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/317/167317/michael-shashoua-waters.JPG.webp?h=acfe3244&itok=ceJMABf4)
The opportunities that emerging markets typically offer—especially when established and mature markets aren’t doing so well—aren’t always as great as they might seem at face value. Last month, Inside Reference Data (IRD) reported on the scarcity of evaluated pricing information in emerging markets, an obstacle to getting accurate and fast pricing data. An evaluated pricing professional observed that in any new market, information is generally going to be scarce and developing markets aren’t able to match the timeliness of data delivery seen in developed markets.
Therefore, firms doing business in the developing markets have to shell out in order to support their front offices’ abilities to get timely data sources. The key to spending wisely toward that goal, however, means taking a wider view of which areas within a firm are key to achieving faster data, including personnel, infrastructure and operational professionalism.
Additional Hurdles
Looking ahead to what IRD will investigate next month, we are finding that there are still other hurdles to clear concerning data management in emerging markets, particularly the issue of proprietary standards. The Brazilian market is a good example of this.
Brazil has, in some ways, graduated from its emerging market status, achieving greater transparency and attracting data providers and services both large and small. And they do face competition from established local providers that have an advantage of being better suited to their home turf than outside players whose infrastructure is too far ahead of what Brazilian systems can accommodate.
Similarly, having proprietary standards seems counterintuitive when organizations such as Swift are trying to make data and messaging standards compatible and consistent worldwide. In its annual Sibos conference this month, the industry cooperative is including a discussion on the future of the Brazilian market and its ongoing evolution, with representatives from Citi, Bradesco Asset Management and Febraban as participants.
“We have to be able to go after local markets and ask what we can do to help the industry with transaction flow to Latin American markets or make it more consistent and standardized around the world,” says Eileen Dignen, managing director, banking accounts and initiatives at Swift.
Certainly, there can be pitfalls to standardization, as was seen in 2009 when European regulators sanctioned Standard & Poor’s for abusing its role as caretaker for CUSIP (Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures) codes for US securities. Yet CUSIP still held value and importance for reducing the risk of failed trades and inaccurate reporting, as Diane Poole, senior vice president of the American Bankers Association wrote in an opinion article published in IRD in October 2010. Proprietary intelligence is necessary to reduce the cost of creating identifiers, she believes.
“It is possible to create identifiers at a reduced cost by removing proprietary intelligence from the process and simply issuing random codes,” she argues. “But that is hardly a step forward in the quest for transparency in financial markets. The only way to ensure the marketplace continues to receive identifiers that speed up trade processing and settlement—while giving market participants the confidence that their data is accurate—is through focused reinvestment into the system.”
Hard Time Focusing
The data providers based outside of the Brazilian market will have a harder time focusing their investment on improving the quality and speed of data if proprietary standards—in this case standards specific only to that one country’s markets—remain the only game in town. For a market trying to shed its “emerging” label, stubborn refusal to work toward compatibility with internationally accepted standards could keep Brazil firmly planted among markets still trying to emerge.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.
This Week: FCA, Plato/Turquoise, Franklin Templeton, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.