Bats Europe Rolls Out Buy-Side Access to LIS IOI Platform
The Bats LIS IOI platform offers buy-side traders access to block trading in European equities ahead of upcoming Mifid II rule changes.
Bats LIS, an indication of interest (IOI) negotiation and execution platform allowing market users to negotiate large blocks of European equities without revealing intentions to the wider market, was initially rolled out to the sell side late last year. Buy-side firms have now been granted access to the platform through the BIDS Trader system, which integrates with asset managers’ order management systems and execution management systems.
Block trading is expected to increase for asset managers, following the introduction of Mifid II in January next year. Under the new regulation, waivers will be introduced that enable market participants to negotiate large-in-scale trades without pre-trade transparency requirements, designed to protect block trades from unfavorable market movements caused by available information.
Credit Suisse, JPMorgan and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, among others, have already gone live on the Bats LIS platform, with more expected to join later this month.
“Designed to meet the unique needs of the buy side, Bats LIS provides buy-side firms with control over their IOIs up until execution, which helps to protect against information leakage, while maintaining their important relationships with brokers,” said Mark Hemsley, CEO of Bats Europe, in a statement. “Additionally, Bats LIS is unique in that it brings together the block flow of both the buy side and the sell side, which allows for greater crossing opportunities.”
Bats Europe is part of Bats Global Markets, which was acquired by CBOE Holdings, operator of the Chicago Board Options Exchange, in September last year in a deal worth approximately $3.2 billion.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project