In Every Challenge Lies an Opportunity
The struggles firms went through to understand their exposure to Lehman Brothers have become the stuff of legends in data management circles, and hardly a conference or industry gathering goes by without somebody referring to the fallout from the bank's collapse in 2008.
Since then, the introduction of new regulations and the development of the legal entity identifier have helped to raise standards of counterparty risk management. However, the situation is still unsatisfactory, as was highlighted in a report on the subject by an international group of market supervisors earlier this month.
The report concluded that: "Five years after the financial crisis, firms' progress toward consistent, timely, and accurate reporting of top counterparty exposures fails to meet both supervisory expectations and industry self-identified best practices. The area of greatest concern remains firms' inability to consistently produce high-quality data."
There are many causes for these shortcomings. Some practitioners explain they face serious challenges sourcing the data they need from vendors. They say it is impossible to rely on one vendor for all their counterparty data needs and rather than expanding their coverage, many data vendors are competing on the same attributes. They complain that while new regulations are putting an emphasis on funds, this area in particular is poorly served by data vendors.
Others suggest the problem is more a question of maintaining good counterparty data, at a time when the budgets of operations teams are being reduced. While firms would traditionally employ a large operations team to manually review counterparty data, budget cuts are making this impossible and, as a result, firms are increasingly turning to technology vendors for data quality tools that can help them automate the validation process.
Whether the counterparty data problems facing firms are a question of data sourcing or data maintenance, it is clear that, with regulators breathing down firms' necks, there are many opportunities for data and technology vendors to help.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.