Max Bowie: Forget Lower Latency, Focus on Lower Costs
Low latency isn’t a strategy—it’s a technology that acts as an enabler of strategies. It makes you faster, not better. And over recent years, it has become the liquid courage of high-frequency traders, convinced that they get smoother and smarter with each swig of latency drained from the glass, and that they can pick up any cute trade hanging out on the order book.
But now, firms are examining the rising costs of achieving low latency, especially in light of the need to spend elsewhere, on items such as improving data governance—an area where 67 percent of investment managers have weak processes in place, according to a survey from benchmark data provider Rimes Technologies, conducted by London-based consultancy Investit. Hence, firms are more closely scrutinizing the role of latency—and how effective it is at delivering returns. “I’m a strong believer that speed doesn’t generate alpha—speed amplifies alpha. Is it worth $30 million dollars to save a few microseconds if that makes you fastest for a year?” said Peter Nabicht, CTO of Allston Trading, at Waters’ sibling publication Inside Market Data’s recent Chicago conference.
And as it becomes harder to improve headline speed, the industry will step up its focus on other areas related to latency, said Azul Systems CTO Gil Tene at the event, such as measuring and improving variability and predictability. Indeed, a whole industry has built up over the years around monitoring latency and jitter, with vendors dedicated to measuring every aspect of network and systems latency, throughput and performance—although, according to Peter Lankford, director of the Securities Technology Analysis Center, who presented at the recent Buy-Side Technology North American Summit, many firms aren’t happy with the results and lack confidence in their levels of time synchronization.
Winning ‘Formula’
The latency race is often compared to Formula One racing. So, to use that analogy, low latency is like having the fastest engine. But a race car also needs wheels, a steering wheel, suspension and aerodynamic design, as well as a team boss to decide race strategy, a pit crew to change tires—ever-more important since algorithms’ lifespans get shorter and must be replaced more frequently—not to mention a talented driver. Because grands prix aren’t just won in a drag race on the straightaway, they’re won through teamwork, racecraft, and—just as in trading—the ability to spot opportunities and enter and exit positions to haul yourself up the leader board.
“Speed doesn’t generate alpha—speed amplifies alpha. It doesn’t matter how fast I am if someone makes a better decision around quantifying the markets and trades 30 seconds before me.” —Peter Nabicht, Allston Trading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project