Lies, Damn Lies, and Surveys
Sometimes they make me want to laugh; sometimes they make me want to launch into a profanity-laced tirade—the bottom line is that surveys and poll results are a necessary evil, but are often of limited value and shouldn’t be taken too seriously. This is only exacerbated during an election year. Every time President Barack Obama delivers a speech, the talking heads gleefully serve up the latest poll numbers. If Mitt Romney makes a gaffe, the news networks examine how much ground he's lost.
If you believe the news networks, Americans change their minds on a weekly basis about which candidate they're going to vote for come November. Yet in my experience, only a handful of people hadn’t already made up their minds before election season even began.
In financial technology, surveys and polls abound. Indeed, we at WatersTechnology produce them on a regular basis. They provide an interesting snapshot of what people are thinking, but always take the results with a grain of salt—and not just because the results aren’t scientific.
Often, survey and polltakers bear out the principle that “you don’t know what you know,” and don’t answer the questions accurately. A good example of this came in May when Waters conducted a webcast looking at cloud adoption on the buy side.
During the online event, 35 percent of respondents said they don’t use cloud at all. Really? Not for email? Not for data storage? No deployments of software-as-a-services (SaaS)? Nada?
I just don’t buy it—and I believe most respondents don’t understand exactly what cloud encompasses. If they don’t employ Amazon or Google, they assume their firms are cloud-free.
Survey and poll inaccuracies are not only the fault of the respondents. I receive surveys that are either conducted by, or sponsored by, vendors and trade associations. In these cases, people might answer questions based on what they think the pollster wants to hear, or because they have an agenda to advance.
So if surveys and polls are flawed in some way or another, they must be useless, right? Wrong.
What they do is allow firms and vendors to look out for knowledge gaps, misunderstandings—as in the cloud question—or general areas that need attention. They are not the be-all, end-all—they’re guides.
I never allow someone to win an argument by citing a survey. But if the numbers are out of whack, there's a reason to take a deeper look. The numbers are useless; the topics can be fruitful.
Let's take an informal poll: Who thinks surveys are useless? Email "yay" or "nay" to me at anthony.malakian@incisivemedia.com or give me a call at 646-490-3973.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project