The Death of Blockchain (Hype)
As we turn the calendar over, the hype machine surrounding the blockchain industry is still strong. Anthony hopes that it will meet an untimely demise in 2019.
Did you hear about the blockchain?! Yes, better than the internet and bigger than the Beatles, it’s going to change technology as we know it! Or … it won’t. Yeah, it probably won’t. But damn, it sure does provide for a nice sales pitch, doesn’t it?
Don’t get me wrong, blockchain-powered platforms are interesting and will one day prove to be useful pieces of technologies, but right now the hype around them is overblown. A revolution like the internet, cloud technologies and machine learning? I think not.
As we ring in the New Year, maybe we can also sound the death knell for blockchain—or at least the hype-machine that surrounds it. The advent of distributed-ledger technology (DLT) was a case study in irrational exuberance. While there were always use-cases for DLTs, they became the embodiment of a hammer looking for a nail. T+0 settlement for US equities? Oh yeah, we can do that. Unparalleled security for the cloud? We’ve got you covered. High-speed trading without added latency? Sure, why not. Cure cancer? Go big, or go home!
Yet what we’ve seen is a whole lot of disappointment. Banks that were so eager to join one blockchain consortium or another, have staggered out of the room with little to show for their efforts. Highly touted proofs-of-concept were quietly swept away like dust in the wind. Even the lionized Blythe Masters has stepped down as CEO of Digital Asset Holdings, proving once more that you should not make idols in the worlds of crypto and blockchain.
We enter 2019 with little evidence that blockchains are truly better than traditional databases, en masse—same as it was when we entered 2016, 2017 and 2018.
For the October 2016 issue of Waters, I wrote a feature, Blockchain: The Revolution Has Been Over-hyped. Over two years later, I could easily use that headline once again to write another feature on the same topic. So where does that leave us? Trust me, the hype is still there. This year you will read numerous press releases and articles proclaiming that some fintech startup has raised X-million to help build their version of a blockchain panacea. Blockchain still sells as a buzzword and venture capitalists are still listening.
But here are a few things to keep in mind in order to help you to fine-tune your blockchain B.S. detector. First, it’s important to remember that in the last year, a plethora of industry “media” outlets have popped up to help promote the blockchain industry.
These publications are hardly independent and, as such, their coverage is often biased. Know the sources of your information. Furthermore, even for reputable mainstream publications, they can often get lost in the fog of tech hype. A major newspaper’s finance reporters aren’t as used to covering technology and they can accidentally fall into the role of carnival barker—it happened to me plenty when I first started covering finance (and, only later, tech) over a decade ago at American Banker magazine.
And in a nascent market, it’s not always easy to spot the fraudsters. Take, for example, the curious case of a Blockchain Terminal startup. Apparently, the startup, CG Blockchain, was created by Boaz Manor, the jailed former head of Canada’s Portus Alternative Asset Management who, upon release, reportedly started this vendor under an assumed identity, Shaun MacDonald. It’s an odd story that was first written about in The Block. The name of the startup caught my eye, though, because earlier in 2018, I had written a story about them. Tech giant FactSet had entered into a partnership in February that would allow users of FactSet’s order and execution management system to access CG Blockchain’s products through the latter’s app store, BCT Fundstore. (As this story went to press, FactSet had yet to provide an update on the relationship.) I didn’t speak with anyone from CG Blockchain; it’s lazy, but quite frankly all that mattered to me was FactSet’s involvement since that’s what our readers would care most about. It’s a lesson learned, and I’ve been covering tech at WatersTechnology for nine-plus years.
This is all to say that this is a confusing market that’s still ripe for hype. While small steps will be made on the blockchain front in 2019, bigger than the internet this is not. Be wary of anyone telling you otherwise—or at least ask for some tangible proof.
UPDATE: After this story went to press it was announced that FactSet has filed a lawsuit against CG Blockchain.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project