Home Is Where the Hearth Is
Indeed, the issue of identity is a dispersed one in the modern age, particularly among my generation Y, and probably even more so with Z and on. The internet, that great enabler, has been a catalyst for breaking down national identity and geographical borders. The same has historically been true for the capital markets, allowing firms to extend a global reach through market connectivity, access and electronic trading, giving five people in a shoebox office somewhere in London the chance to trade New York, Euronext markets and Asia-Pacific.
Under Pressure
Modern regulatory efforts, though, are keen to move back to scenario where firms are delineated according to nationality. Or, if you will, cut through where they happen to be to determine where ‘home' is for them. This becomes particularly important with Dodd-Frank Act rules on reporting for derivatives, what constitutes a US person, and when de minimis exceptions are breached, to name a few areas.
The result is a technology issue, of course, not just through identifiers, but as one specialist from Citi told me the other day, "identifiers on identifiers". On an essential level, this is basic know your customer, right? Where is that legal entity based, and as such, which regulatory jurisdiction do they fall under? Following that on, what are my reporting obligations, and to whom?
It sounds simple enough, but as with most things in this space, it's not. You might reasonably assume a Citi counterparty, being one of the major US banks, would be a US counterparty. But the trade went through their office in Japan, you're in Singapore, and you executed a swap transaction bilaterally, over the phone, backed up by ISDA agreements. Not applicable in terms of Dodd-Frank, right? Maybe not.
It's an interesting, but thoroughly complicated area, and one which will take center stage next year as many of these regulatory mandates become concrete and engaged.
You might reasonably assume a Citi counterparty, being one of the major US banks, would be a US counterparty. But the trade went through their office in Japan, you're in Singapore, and you executed a swap transaction bilaterally, over the phone, backed up by ISDA agreements. Not applicable in terms of Dodd-Frank, right? Maybe not.
New Year
As this will be the last Editor's Letter of 2013, I'd like to take the chance to wish you all a merry Christmas, and I hope that you all have a happy New Year, too. Thanks for your continued support of the magazine and our events.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
This Week: FCA, Plato/Turquoise, Franklin Templeton, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Insurers deny cyber premiums are rising
Contrary to banks’ complaints, underwriters and brokers claim current market for policies is soft.
Size matters: US equity market players wrangle over new tick size regime
The industry expects the SEC to finalize the Reg NMS shake-up as soon as late summer. While there is broad agreement about the need for change, the extent of the reduction in access fees and tick sizes will have a big impact on markets.
CME: CFTC OKs clearing move to Google Cloud
The CFTC has given the Chicago-based exchange approval to run its clearing and settlement infrastructure on the Google Cloud Platform, while the exchange and vendor have extended their partnership to last until at least 2037.
Cutting through the hype surrounding the FDTA rulemaking process
A bill requiring US regulators and institutions to adopt a machine-readable data framework for reporting purposes applies to entity identifiers, but not security identifiers, in a crucial difference, writes Scott Preiss, SVP and global head of Cusip Global Services.
Northern Trust offers internal fund accounting, data tools to clients
Regulations and a mandate to enhance quality and transparency in a bid to improve the investor experience are pushing buy-side firms to have more oversight of their third-party providers.
EU firms press for faster move to T+1 after smooth US rollout
Following the example set by North America, 70% of attendees at a European hearing on shorter settlement cycles favored a Q4 2027 switch to next-day settlement.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.