T-Minus One Year: It’s Now or Never on Mifid II
John hopes that preparations for the incoming regulation are top of the New Year’s resolutions pile for asset managers.
![jan-new-year jan-new-year](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/775/359775/jan-new-year-580x358.jpeg.webp?itok=PPrnN42i)
January is paradoxically the most optimistic and bleakest time of the year for some; while the cold, dark days are a far cry from the festive cheer just passed, it's also a time to make changes for the better, to be more than we have been in the past.
As such, it's rather fitting that Mifid II will finally be implemented on January 3 next year. While regulatory compliance isn't exactly optional, the industry has now reached its tipping point. For those firms that have yet to start work on implementing necessary systems or putting adequate policies in place, it's surely now or never.
Now you may be thinking, "Haven't we been here before though, John?" and you'd be right. Back at the start of September last year I said that the time for talking was over and that action was now required, despite the lingering vagaries around some key elements of the regulation.
And of course it's not as if each section of the regulation comes into force at the same time on January 3, 2018, with various parts spread out either over the course of this year or after next year's go-live date.
Generally speaking, there's no real reason for firms not be fully compliant by this time next year, especially when the year-long delay is taken into account. The question now is: How much longer will we be hearing that Mifid II preparations are either a top priority for asset managers, or, failing that, what the excuses for non-compliance in 2018 may be.
The MAR Test
My colleague, Aggelos Andreou, this week wrote about the buy-side's reaction to the implementation of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) in July last year, which introduced stricter rules around surveillance, market manipulation and insider dealing.
While it seems that the majority of the buy side were able to get their house in order prior to the new rules coming in, some took advantage of a more lenient approach by regulators to earn a period of grace. I'm sure that by now we've all heard similar stories of planned procrastination within certain sections of the market concerning Mifid II readiness, with some participants either hoping to be overlooked or simply preferring to take a fine instead of the arduous work required.
Whatever happens in January next year, much still needs to be done. While MAR can show some indications of the readiness of the buy side for complicated new regulation, Mifid II is an entirely different beast with many more tentacles to untangle. Will a year be long enough for those laggards that have so far dragged their heels? My feeling is that no, it really isn't.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Waters Wavelength Ep. 305: Cato Institute's Jennifer Schulp
Jennifer joins to discuss what regulatory priorities might look under Paul Atkin's SEC.
Examining Cboe’s lawsuit appealing SEC’s OEMS rule rejection
The Chicago-based exchange has sued the regulator in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals after the agency blocked a proposed rule that would change how Silexx is classified.
European exchange data prices surge, new study shows
The report analyzed market data prices and fee structures from 2017 to 2024 and found that fee schedules have increased exponentially. Several exchanges say the findings are misleading.
Regis-TR and the Emir Refit blame game
The reporting overhaul was been marred by problems at repositories, prompting calls to stagger future go-live dates.
FCA: Consolidated tape for UK equities won’t happen until 2028
At an event last week, the FCA proposed a new timeline for the CT, which received pushback from participants, according to sources.
Cusip Global Services wants to know, ‘What’s your damage?’
The evidence and discovery phase of the case against the identifier bureau is set to expire in March, bringing an anticipated jury trial one step closer.
Big questions linger as DORA compliance approaches
The major EU regulation will go live tomorrow. Outstanding clarifications and confusion around the definition of an ICT service, penetration testing, subcontracting, and more remain.
Insurance: The role of risktech in effectively managing emerging risks and driving competitive edge
This whitepaper covers the global survey, conducted by Chartis Research and TCS, of banking, financial services and insurance firms, which found that insurers are struggling to adapt to evolving risks and regulatory requirement increases. Chartis offers…