T-Minus One Year: It’s Now or Never on Mifid II
John hopes that preparations for the incoming regulation are top of the New Year’s resolutions pile for asset managers.

January is paradoxically the most optimistic and bleakest time of the year for some; while the cold, dark days are a far cry from the festive cheer just passed, it's also a time to make changes for the better, to be more than we have been in the past.
As such, it's rather fitting that Mifid II will finally be implemented on January 3 next year. While regulatory compliance isn't exactly optional, the industry has now reached its tipping point. For those firms that have yet to start work on implementing necessary systems or putting adequate policies in place, it's surely now or never.
Now you may be thinking, "Haven't we been here before though, John?" and you'd be right. Back at the start of September last year I said that the time for talking was over and that action was now required, despite the lingering vagaries around some key elements of the regulation.
And of course it's not as if each section of the regulation comes into force at the same time on January 3, 2018, with various parts spread out either over the course of this year or after next year's go-live date.
Generally speaking, there's no real reason for firms not be fully compliant by this time next year, especially when the year-long delay is taken into account. The question now is: How much longer will we be hearing that Mifid II preparations are either a top priority for asset managers, or, failing that, what the excuses for non-compliance in 2018 may be.
The MAR Test
My colleague, Aggelos Andreou, this week wrote about the buy-side's reaction to the implementation of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) in July last year, which introduced stricter rules around surveillance, market manipulation and insider dealing.
While it seems that the majority of the buy side were able to get their house in order prior to the new rules coming in, some took advantage of a more lenient approach by regulators to earn a period of grace. I'm sure that by now we've all heard similar stories of planned procrastination within certain sections of the market concerning Mifid II readiness, with some participants either hoping to be overlooked or simply preferring to take a fine instead of the arduous work required.
Whatever happens in January next year, much still needs to be done. While MAR can show some indications of the readiness of the buy side for complicated new regulation, Mifid II is an entirely different beast with many more tentacles to untangle. Will a year be long enough for those laggards that have so far dragged their heels? My feeling is that no, it really isn't.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Experts say HKEX’s plan for T+1 in 2025 is ‘sensible’
The exchange will continue providing core post-trade processing through CCASS but will engage with market participants on the service’s future as HKEX rolls out new OCP features.
No, no, no, and no: Overnight trading fails in SIP votes
The CTA and UTP operating committees voted yesterday on proposals from US exchanges to expand their trading hours and could not reach unanimous consensus.
Big xyt exploring bid to provide EU equities CT
So far, only one group, a consortium of the major European exchanges, has formally kept its hat in the ring to provide Europe’s consolidated tape for equities.
Jump Trading CIO: 24/7 trading ‘inevitable’
Execs from Jump, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and the DTCC say round-the-clock trading—whether five or seven days a week—is the future, but tech and data hurdles still exist.
Pisces season: Platform providers feed UK plan for private stock market
Several companies in the US and the UK are considering participating in a UK program to build a private stock market composed of separate trading platforms.
How to navigate regional nuances that complicate T+1 in Europe
European and UK firms face unique challenges in moving to T+1 settlement, writes Broadridge’s Carl Bennett, and they will need to follow a series of steps to ensure successful adoption by 2027.
Nasdaq leads push to reform options regulatory fee
A proposed rule change would pare costs for traders, raise them for banks, and defund smaller venues.
The CAT declawed as Citadel’s case reaches end game
The SEC reduced the CAT’s capacity to collect information on investors, in a move that will have knock-on effects for its ongoing funding model case with Citadel.