The Road to Shorter Settlement Cycles
![freeman-tony-omgeo freeman-tony-omgeo](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/053/221053/freeman-tony-omgeo-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=7KdCKmqo)
Settlement efficiency has long been an area of interest to policy makers in Europe as a means to mitigate risk in the financial markets. This was, in part, prompted by the Giovannini Group's reports on the barriers to settlement and clearing efficiency published in 2001 and 2003. Conversely, while the US had been at the forefront of accelerating its settlement cycles at the turn of the new millennium, its SSC goal of moving to T+1 was tabled after September 11, 2001, when US firms turned their attention to other areas of risk.
However, momentum and discussion around SSC in the US is once again gaining ground, and in response, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), with the guidance of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), commissioned a Boston Consulting Group (BCG) report on the cost-benefit analysis of moving to SSC in the US, which was published in October 2012.
Managing Risk
The report makes for interesting reading. While it does not include any recommendations on accelerating the US settlement timetable to T+2 or T+1, it states that up to 75 percent of all survey respondents view SSC as a way to reduce risk across the industry, with 68 percent supporting the move and up to 60 percent mentioning their firms would benefit directly from risk reduction. Other key benefits cited included process efficiency, reductions in loss exposure and cost savings.
Indeed, according to the BCG paper, if the industry shifts just one day, moving from T+3 to T+2, the total savings in buy-side risk in the US alone would be $200M. When a second day is saved, moving from T+3 to T+1, the overall reduction in buy-side risk jumps to $410M. However, in order for this to be achieved, all firms must look at their operational processes and infrastructure to ensure they can meet the more aggressive timelines associated with SSC.
Balkanized
It is clear from the progress of regulation across the EU, the increasing debate in the US, and the likelihood that several Asian markets will follow, that SSC─perhaps even a global, harmonized settlement cycle─is on the horizon. Today, the global settlement landscape includes multiple, non-harmonized settlement cycles ranging from five days after execution to zero (same-day settlement), and each market determines its settlement cycle individually. Ultimately, regulators, policymakers and market participants all play an important role in achieving SSC and the resulting benefits of reduced systemic and firm risk, lowered costs across the industry and increased liquidity.
Regulators, policymakers and market participants all play an important role in achieving SSC and the resulting benefits of reduced systemic and firm risk, lowered costs across the industry and increased liquidity.
The BCG identified 11 enablers to achieving SSC, and while the paper focuses on the settlement cycle in the US, most enablers can be applied across all regions looking to achieve SSC. In this series, I will explore the enablers that fall squarely in the middle and back office, which are: Migration to Trade-Date Matching, Match to Settle, and Cross-Industry Standing Settlement Instruction Solution.
Next week, I will begin by looking at Migration to Trade-Data Matching, perhaps the most significant enabler to SSC globally.
Tony Freeman is the executive director of industry relations at Omgeo. Over the next few weeks, Tony will be contributing to Waters on the various enablers that need to be put in place in order to achieve SSC. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of Waters or Omgeo.
Read the other parts of this series:
- The Road to Shorter Settlement Cycles
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher