ASIC Tightens Automated Trading Controls
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has published its latest report on market structure, in which it has proposed enhanced oversight for automated trading strategies.
Market participants utilizing automated functions in trading will now be required to maintain pre-trade filters, as well as the ability to suspend or limit as required. They will also be mandated to hold increased control over their order entry systems, and to submit their systems for review at least annually.
ASIC expects the new rules to cost current participants for compliance, although it does mention that many firms already have similar processes in place. The rules have come on the back of a disaster at US broker Knight Capital several weeks ago, in which an abberant algorithm lost the company $440 million in a day, requiring it to be bailed out by a consortium of other brokers and market-makers.
"Recent events overseas are a reminder of the speed and automation of markets and the importance of robust controls over those systems," says Belinda Gibson, deputy chair at ASIC. "The enhancements to participant-level controls that ASIC has released for consultation, together with the market-level controls released in June will build confidence in the integrity and cleanliness of our capital markets and facilitate international capital flows. The increasing automation of trading, and ASIC's focus on it, is also evident in our market supervision report, which identified issues from high frequency trading. This type of trading, and algorithms generally, continue to be of concern. The measures we are proposing will strengthen our protection against the type of disruption we have seen recently in other markets."
The new proposals have been foreshadowed since June 2012, when the regulator published Consultation Paper 179. The new paper, 184, titled Australian market structure: Draft market integrity rules and guidance on automated trading, further extends previous mentions and opens the text to comment from market participants until September 2012.
The increasing automation of trading, and ASIC's focus on it, is also evident in our market supervision report, which identified issues from high frequency trading. This type of trading, and algorithms generally, continue to be of concern.
ASIC's review process has been held in tandem with the liberalization of its securities markets. Traditionally dominated by the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), Chi-X Australia was allowed to launch as a competitor last year, prompting a rise in the use of electronic strategies such as those involving the use of algorithms and high-frequency trading.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
BlackRock, BNY see T+1 success in industry collaboration, old frameworks
Industry testing and lessons from the last settlement change from T+3 to T+2 were some of the components that made the May transition run smoothly.
How ‘Bond gadgets’ make tackling data easier for regulators and traders
The IMD Wrap: Everyone loves the hype around AI, especially financial firms. And now, even regulators are getting in on the act. But first... “The name’s Bond; J-AI-mes Bond”
Can the EU and UK reach T+1 together?
Prompted by the North American migration, both jurisdictions are drawing up guidelines for reaching next-day settlement.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 293: Reference Data Drama
Tony and Reb discuss the Financial Data Transparency Act's proposed rules around identifiers and the industry reaction.
Clearing houses fear being classified as DORA third parties
As the 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members are seeking risk information that’s usually deemed confidential.
Industry not sold on FIGI mandate for US reg reporting
Banks’ and asset managers’ tortured relationship with Cusip numbers remains tortured, as they tell regulators to keep the taxonomy in play.
T+1 shift sees out-of-hours human resourcing costs spike by as much as 20%
New research finds that trading firms are experiencing increased labor costs—which could be a boon for outsourced trading.
CBOE and Aquis to make bid for European equities tape
The challenger exchanges have plans to become the second public bidder for provider of the European equities tape, following EuroCTP’s incorporation last year.