Ready to Comply?
Strapline: Golden Copy
A common thread emerges throughout a few different issues covered in this month’s Inside Reference Data—the Solvency II rules, using data management to mitigate risk, and the concept of big data—and that is whether securities industry participants are ready, or will be ready, to either comply with regulation or implement initiatives that are being discussed.
In Nicholas Hamilton’s feature on Solvency II, HSBC Securities Services’ Chris Johnson observes that firms still need to figure out “joined-up data consistency,” meaning they cannot cling to competitive secrecy, at least when it comes to providing information in a consistent format. Firms could each try to solve, singularly and without collaboration, regulatory reporting challenges under Solvency II, but they will inevitably produce different and incompatible answers. In the same story, SAS UK consultant Simon Kirby notes that many of these firms are operating in silos, which can also cause incompatible data sets.
Our report on an October 27 webcast on managing risk included a poll of attendees about whether they think their systems are adequate to meet regulatory requirements. Twenty-four percent said they will not be able to meet requirements with current systems. While 64% said they have systems ready and adopted, that number really ought to be much higher—perfection may not be possible, but it seems like the type of criteria that should be above 95%. At least, this state of affairs may help gain support for necessary data management projects, as Nick Helton, global reference data manager at Northern Trust, observed during the webcast.
In this month’s ‘Interview With’, Daryan Dehghanpisheh of Intel details ways the chip-maker is trying to help financial industry firms address big data issues, particularly those caused by new forms of relevant data such as Twitter feeds and Google searches, if one counts those within the range of information defined as “big data.” On this concept, it isn’t a matter of firms being unaware or unprepared, but Dehghanpisheh says firms are trying to build systems with the scalability to keep up.
Inevitably, when the industry has seen new regulatory mandates such as these, or operational developments, polls and surveys at industry conferences, or remarks on panels and in trade media like ours, reveal a sizable portion of firms and practitioners who believe they are unprepared or unaware of how to prepare to meet the new needs. Does the occurrence of this phenomenon depend on what the task or requirement is, or is it inherent to the industry no matter what the initiative?
Finally, don’t forget to visit Inside Reference Data’s LinkedIn discussion group. We will periodically ask for your reactions to these opinions there. If you have an interesting or compelling viewpoint—especially if you disagree—you may have it distributed more widely in future columns and reporting.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
BlackRock, BNY see T+1 success in industry collaboration, old frameworks
Industry testing and lessons from the last settlement change from T+3 to T+2 were some of the components that made the May transition run smoothly.
How ‘Bond gadgets’ make tackling data easier for regulators and traders
The IMD Wrap: Everyone loves the hype around AI, especially financial firms. And now, even regulators are getting in on the act. But first... “The name’s Bond; J-AI-mes Bond”
Can the EU and UK reach T+1 together?
Prompted by the North American migration, both jurisdictions are drawing up guidelines for reaching next-day settlement.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 293: Reference Data Drama
Tony and Reb discuss the Financial Data Transparency Act's proposed rules around identifiers and the industry reaction.
Clearing houses fear being classified as DORA third parties
As the 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members are seeking risk information that’s usually deemed confidential.
Industry not sold on FIGI mandate for US reg reporting
Banks’ and asset managers’ tortured relationship with Cusip numbers remains tortured, as they tell regulators to keep the taxonomy in play.
T+1 shift sees out-of-hours human resourcing costs spike by as much as 20%
New research finds that trading firms are experiencing increased labor costs—which could be a boon for outsourced trading.
CBOE and Aquis to make bid for European equities tape
The challenger exchanges have plans to become the second public bidder for provider of the European equities tape, following EuroCTP’s incorporation last year.