Opening Cross: Fixated on Fixed Income as MiFID Expands Reach
![max-bowie max-bowie](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/807/101807/max-bowie-incisivemedia-color.jpg.webp?h=ee12d8fd&itok=FIjEj0Li)
The European Commission last week released proposals for the second iteration of its Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, which shook up equities trading in Europe, prompted the creation of new multilateral trading facilities, and caused trading to fragment, creating a wealth of new data and demands for a US-style consolidated tape to re-aggregate this fragmented data.
MiFID 2 includes a “mandated” tape—though one that allow vendors to offer their own competing tapes, rather than prescribing a single utility-style entity to administer a tape, in the way that the Consolidated Tape Association does in the US. However, while the CTA provides consolidated quote and trade data from fragmented US markets, any European tapes will provide trade data only. I still find it surprising that a regulatory body that has set pre-trade rules around trading across multiple venues and best execution would not also more strictly regulate the pre-trade data required to achieve its prescribed aims.
Not surprising, though, is that MiFID 2 will extend to asset classes beyond equities, and contribute to the forces driving bonds and derivatives onto exchanges or centrally-cleared, exchange-like platforms, such as European bond trading platform the Galaxy MTF, which recently received approval to operate as an exchange from the Swiss regulator. It’s also not surprising that more venues would want to trade fixed income assets: Third quarter turnover in Börse Berlin’s bonds trading segment increased by 183 percent over Q3 last year.
Participants in IMD’s Fixed Income report, which accompanies this issue, agree that more fixed income trading will move onto electronic platforms, and acknowledge that centrally-cleared platforms will reduce the risk associated with over-the-counter trading and increase trading and data volumes, but are not necessarily convinced that moving assets onto exchange platforms will automatically create more demand or better-quality data—especially if clearing costs make it prohibitive for firms to trade OTC assets and liquidity moves elsewhere.
However, such a move is expected to create more demand for market and historical data, which Celent senior analyst Anshuman Jaswal says has been one of the barriers to greater adoption of algorithmic trading in the fixed income markets, along with a lack of streaming prices, since most fixed income platforms use a request-for-quote model, rather than an order-driven marketplace—though Christine Sheeka, market data product manager at MTS, says the European bond trading platform is launching a platform for corporate bonds trading that will operate on a transparent, order-driven model.
And while transparency is the aim of MiFID, Lee Sanders, head of fixed income and money markets for London and Paris at AXA Investment Managers, says the most important factor for any trader is simply liquidity, followed by any information that gives an insight into economic activity to be able to take advantage of wider bid-offer spreads that usually manifest during periods of volatility. But while participants point to continuing economic uncertainty and market volatility, a recent report from ratings agency Moody’s says that default rates and negative ratings actions are expected to remain below the historical average over the next 12 months. Yet this is not creating the same sense of security that has historically been associated with fixed income markets. In fact, demand for data is rising as firms—still mindful of the credit crunch—try to better understand holdings, counterparties, liquidity positions and financings, says John Jay, senior analyst at Aite Group.
The question is whether these moves will make OTC markets more accessible, efficient and liquid, or just more commoditized, and drive traders to other, less standardized assets with higher returns but also higher risk, which may be the subject of MiFID 3.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Northern Trust offers internal fund accounting, data tools to clients
Regulations and a mandate to enhance quality and transparency in a bid to improve the investor experience are pushing buy-side firms to have more oversight of their third-party providers.
EU firms press for faster move to T+1 after smooth US rollout
Following the example set by North America, 70% of attendees at a European hearing on shorter settlement cycles favored a Q4 2027 switch to next-day settlement.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.