Bats Europe Begins Client Testing for Mifid II Order Record-Keeping Requirement
European exchange calls for harmonization across industry.
![shutterstock-213521062 shutterstock-213521062](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/728/344728/shutterstock-213521062-580x358.jpeg.webp?itok=Zgzbw21S)
The Mifid II rule, known as RTS 24, requires trading venues to record data during the trading day. The issue firms have faced is how to capture and store sensitive data without reducing efficiencies in order execution.
Bats' solution "captures short form IDs on orders and supplements them with a mapping file containing the underlying data, which can be provided at another time. This mapping file is stored securely until a regulator requires the complete order records," according to a statement from the exchange.
Sensitive data doesn't flow through the core trading system via Bats' solution, and latency from the delivery of large message sizes is minimized, according to the operator.
Another Mifid II requirement for trading venues is around offering a facility to support client testing of algorithms. Bats is upgrading its current facilities by adding several scenarios, including disorderly market conditions.
"In preparation for Mifid II, we've been working closely with the industry to standardize the manner in which investment firms supply required data to our venues. We believe our approach to the record-keeping requirements in Mifid II is a low-impact, secure method and we encourage other venues to adopt this approach to create harmonization across the industry," said David Howson, chief operating officer at Bats Europe, in a statement. "The RTS 24 requirements have been one of the most significant areas of development for Bats as it relates to Mifid II. We have put a lot of time and consideration into the development of this approach and we're pleased to roll-out testing of the solution, enabling our participants to test the process for more than 16 months prior to Mifid II coming into effect on Jan. 3, 2018."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.