Golden Copy: Thoughts About MiFID II Postponement
Will the one-year extension to the start of 2018 be enough to solve the issues that caused the delay?
![shashoua-2016-2 shashoua-2016-2](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/018/339018/shashoua-2016-2.jpeg.webp?h=1ca8e626&itok=ZueanlpK)
Have excuses won out?
As talk began last year that the European Commission was likely to postpone its deadline for compliance with MiFID II from January 2017 to January 2018, I weighed the reasons and justification for this postponement in these Waters and Golden Copy columns.
Maybe the more appropriate question is whose excuses—the industry's or regulators'?
Although some in the industry were saying they needed to re-evaluate budgets and figure out technology solutions to manage data for several compliance efforts, others in trading operations said they were prepared.
Reporting on the European Commission's decision, our sister site Buy-Side Technology noted that the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) would not have been ready to collect data for 15 million financial instruments, from 300 venues, by 2017.
So, on balance, although the industry as a whole may not have been completely ready, the regulatory authority that has to administer MiFID II was not ready at all, and the regulation couldn't realistically go forward without its data collection capability in place.
To say that the only reason for the extension of the deadline was successful industry lobbying seems shortsighted now. Often that is the case when regulation affecting financial services industry operations gets delayed or eased. Also, regulators often are accused, rightly or wrongly, of failing to define specifics for regulation or directives. Yet, that was not the issue with MiFID II. The problem was sheer inability or lack of resources to implement compliance.
This raises a new question—will ESMA be able to muster the resources and capability given an extra year to do so?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Northern Trust offers internal fund accounting, data tools to clients
Regulations and a mandate to enhance quality and transparency in a bid to improve the investor experience are pushing buy-side firms to have more oversight of their third-party providers.
EU firms press for faster move to T+1 after smooth US rollout
Following the example set by North America, 70% of attendees at a European hearing on shorter settlement cycles favored a Q4 2027 switch to next-day settlement.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.