Citi Settles $15 Million Penalty With SEC Over Compliance, Surveillance Failures
Citi failed to properly review thousands of trades executed by several of its trading desks during a 10-year period.
"Today's high-speed markets require that broker-dealers and investment advisers manage the convergence of technology and compliance," said Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC's division of enforcement, in a statement. "Firms must ensure that they have devoted sufficient attention and resources to trade surveillance and other compliance systems."
The New York-based bank agreed to pay a $15 million penalty.
The SEC investigation found Citi failed to review thousands of trades executed by some of its trading desks over a 10-year period. While Citi employees reviewed electronically generated reports of trades on a daily basis, technological errors meant the reports omitted several sources of information about thousands of trades.
The investigation found that Citi's failures occurred from 2002 to 2012. The bank also inadvertently routed more than 467,000 transactions on behalf of advisory clients to an affiliated market marker, which executed the transactions on a principal basis via buying or selling to the clients from its own account.
The SEC found Citi's policies and procedures to avoid these types of occurrences to not be reasonably designed or implemented. The investigation also said Citi's trade surveillance failed to detect the principal transactions for more than two years due to the bank relying upon a report that wasn't designed to capture principal transactions executed through the affiliate.
The bank voluntarily paid $2.5 million, the total profits from the principal transactions, to the affected advisory client accounts. Citi also agreed to retain a consultant to review and recommend improvements to its trade surveillance and advisory account order handling and routing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Big questions linger as DORA compliance approaches
The major EU regulation will go live tomorrow. Outstanding clarifications and confusion around the definition of an ICT service, penetration testing, subcontracting, and more remain.
Insurance: The role of risktech in effectively managing emerging risks and driving competitive edge
This whitepaper covers the global survey, conducted by Chartis Research and TCS, of banking, financial services and insurance firms, which found that insurers are struggling to adapt to evolving risks and regulatory requirement increases. Chartis offers…
FX automation key to post-T+1 success, say custodians
Custody banks saw uptick in demand for automated FX execution to tackle T+1 challenges.
Observations and lessons to learn from the move to T+1
The next few years will see other jurisdictions around the world look to North America for guidance on transitioning to shorter settlement cycles.
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
In 2025, keep reference data weird
The SEC, ESMA, CFTC and other acronyms provided the drama in reference data this year, including in crypto.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 299: ACA Group’s Carlo di Florio
Carlo di Florio joins the podcast to discuss regulations.