Opening Cross: More Data = Less Layering = Less Crying = More Giggling
With new data analysis technologies, there's no excuse for not spotting market manipulation.
![max-bowie max-bowie](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/807/101807/max-bowie-incisivemedia-color.jpg.webp?h=ee12d8fd&itok=FIjEj0Li)
I’m referring to a practice known as “layering,” where a trader is active on both sides of an order book at once in an attempt to manipulate prices. For instance, a trader might flood the order book with low orders to artificially depress the price to the point where it triggers a resting buy order at lower than market price. Sometimes this is accidental, when a trader simply forgets to cancel orders. Either way, regulators and marketplaces are cracking down on the practice to prevent market manipulation. This past week, BATS Global Markets has filed a new rule with the US Securities and Exchange Commission to allow it to expedite the process of suspending participants that engage in manipulative practices, such as layering and “spoofing”—where a trader rapidly places orders then cancels them before anyone can execute against them, which can have the effect of simulating interest in a security or derivative contract and artificially inflate or depress the price, allowing them to then buy or sell at an artificially advantageous price.
Announcing the proposal, BATS officials said that it can take “unacceptable” amounts of time to stop those traders—which it believes are usually “small groups of day traders, often located in foreign jurisdictions, accessing the markets via US broker-dealers,”—who engage in these manipulative practices.
It’s not just the overseas originators of the orders who can face penalties. US firms found engaging in these practices—or allowing them to take place via their infrastructures—could also find themselves in hot water. However, there’s no reason why this should occur, now that data and technology providers like Fidessa have developed tools for monitoring, analyzing and optimizing trades in real time, and when proprietary trading firm Trillium Trading has built a platform that specifically monitors for layering. Indeed, Trillium’s general counsel and chief compliance officer Michael Friedman is somewhat of an expert on the topic: while he was still an external counsel to the firm, industry regulator FINRA raked Trillium over the coals for layering between 2007 and 2010. Trillium was fined $2.26 million and fired nine traders, while FINRA demanded that the firm implement controls to prevent reoccurrences.
The result was Trillium’s Surveyor application, and Friedman has become the firm’s de facto evangelist for the tool. Yet despite clear demand existing for this type of service, the firm found it hard to attract the level of salesperson who could get Surveyor in front of the right people at potential user firms. After all, as Friedman admits, the Surveyor business is much like a startup, which might seem a risky move to the type of sales executive the company hopes to attract.
As luck would have it, mutual contacts directed Trillium to USAM Group, the outsourced sales agency set up by former NYSE Technologies exec Feargal O’Sullivan to provide experienced sales staff to financial technology startups on an on-demand basis. Since starting work with Trillium in June, USAM has already been able to get the ball rolling—though Trillium expects the sales cycle for a tool like Surveyor to be “fairly long”—and may also be able to leverage its client contacts and sales relationships with other vendors to expand Surveyor’s reach beyond what Trillium would have been able to achieve alone. And being a father of twins himself, O’Sullivan is undoubtedly well versed in juggling competing demands and making sure his clients and partners receive equal amounts of attention, to make sure everyone—not just traders—is kept giggling rather than crying.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher