Lessons from the Buy Side
Grousing about the sell side is one of the favored topics in buy-side conferences, as anyone who's attended a number of them will attest. While right now it isn't quite the open-war feel that has pervaded the industry at times, there are occasional flash points that do occur, and this was highlighted at last week's Buy-Side Technology European Summit.
Chief among the digs was the issue of delegated reporting, specifically for the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) mandates that came into force in February.
Senior buy-side execs complained that the sell side is opaque when it comes to opening up to clients about their systems, processes and people behind delegated reporting. Which is understandable, they have a duty of care to their clients and a responsibility to ensure that everything is up to snuff, which includes knowing how and what is being done in their name. After all, buy-side firms are still responsible for the accuracy and quality of their reports, even if they hand it off to someone else as a part of delegated reporting.
Complaints also came from other areas ─ even the regulators ─ about the ability of firms to view their data on trade repositories in an efficient manner, the common theme being that highly manual processes of reconciliation with a firm's own financial data had to take place in order to be sure that the numbers were correct. The UK Financial Conduct Authority, said one of its representatives, would be looking into this alongside the European Securities and Markets Authority.
Ooh-er.
Given the mess that reporting has been, contrary to the ever-sunny opinions of drone-like press statements from higher authorities, it seems there needs to be a bit of give and take between both sides.
You have to have a little sympathy for (in the case) the devil though. I can't imagine that buy-side firms would be particularly happy disclosing the location of their servers, details of their people and other highly confidential processes to their sell-side counterparts, either. But given the mess that reporting has been, contrary to the ever-sunny opinions of drone-like press statements from higher authorities, it seems there needs to be a bit of give and take between both sides. Meaning, it's not something that can just be chalked up to conference speakers being cabbaged, and therefore a little grotty with the absent party.
Indeed, the myriad problems that are still ongoing ─ trade breaks through an inability to match between different trade repositories, a lack of standardization, confusion over unique trade identifier generation and other areas ─ would still point to a malfunctioning system for both the buy and the sell sides. One which is only going to be exacerbated, come August, by the need to report collateral and valuations, too.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
American Bankers Assoc. asks SEC: Do you know what you’re doing?
The industry group disagrees severely with regulators’ interpretation of the Financial Data Transparency Act, hinting at possible legal action in a recently published comment letter.
DORA will change the buy vs. build debate… maybe
Waters Wrap: With DORA’s deadline looming, trading firms are having to reassess their long-term tech strategies. Anthony wonders if that means more building and less buying.
The SEC needs a hand with artificial intelligence
The SEC wants to take a tough stance on AI, but it has a talent problem… or a marketing problem. Or both…
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.