James Rundle: A Different View of Data
The US Commodity Future Trading Commission’s (CFTC’s) inability to even perform basic analysis on the data from transaction reports, as admitted during Commissioner Scott O’Malia’s keynote address at the Swift Standards Forum in London last month, is alarming. It’s not good news for the market as a whole, which needs robust oversight to engender confidence, and it’s not good for individual market participants either, who struggled to put systems in place for reporting, only to find that the information they submit is essentially useless.
Elements of the CFTC clearly believe that they can use technology to overcome this difficulty, fix the glaring blind spot in their wing mirror, and go about actually taking control of market activity. And they can. The technology definitely exists to link futures and swaps markets, crunch the data, throw out analytics, and enable regulators to ask all kinds of weird and wonderful questions about where risk is. But while the technology exists, it’s doubtful whether the CFTC will be able to develop it without a significant increase in resources.
Indeed, some even question whether the CFTC necessarily needs to be able to install a Skynet-esque big data engine that will alert them, in real time, to all possible instances of market manipulation and risk vectors. Some say that a far simpler approach is manageable, and indeed, preferable.
Let’s break reporting down into its primary goals, which are to allow regulators to gain a view of market activity in order to assess weak points, specifically on an institutional level, providing them with a means to measure and manage systemic risk on a wider scale. While I was working on a feature regarding the problems that have occurred in both Europe and the US in terms of establishing reporting regimes with respect to derivatives transactions this month, most practitioners I spoke to pointed out that the CFTC could accomplish this by asking certain questions of swap data repositories (SDRs) alone.
The simplest question would be asking the SDRs to provide the CFTC with a ranked list of which institutions have the highest level of failures per day. Those in the top five consistently are then selected for a site visit and a deep dive into their holdings and books, because their house is clearly not in order. Likewise, as Sapient Global Markets' Cian Ó Braonáin argued, for concentration risk measurement, the most useful tool is clearly identifying products and the notional value on them, which should give regulators an indication of who is trading what and where. Once significant positions are identified, that too can lead to a visit to establish areas such as being over-exposed to a certain product or entity, or over-leveraged across markets.
What it comes down to is an argument over the very essence of surveillance on a regulatory scale.
Surveillance
What it comes down to is an argument over the very essence of surveillance on a regulatory scale. Is it better to be proactive, in which case, technology is the only way to institute real-time alerting, ad-hoc trend analysis, and all of the other areas that the CFTC is looking at? Or is it better to be reactive, where analysis of data is shared among various regulatory agencies, historical information is widely used, and people take priority over machine-driven forensics?
Both approaches have their benefits and drawbacks. The real-time surveillance aspect only works once the rules are properly configured, and it’s nearly impossible to account for every possible permutation of market abuse, systemic fraud, or for any other kind of risk for that matter.
Artificial intelligence would likely be a prerequisite, although on the post-trade, forensic side, it limits the ability of regulators to react quickly to events, and indeed, that loss of speed when the markets themselves move so fast is perhaps too wide to be realistically considered. But something should be done, because the system in its current form simply isn’t working.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
This Week: FCA, Plato/Turquoise, Franklin Templeton, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Insurers deny cyber premiums are rising
Contrary to banks’ complaints, underwriters and brokers claim current market for policies is soft.
Size matters: US equity market players wrangle over new tick size regime
The industry expects the SEC to finalize the Reg NMS shake-up as soon as late summer. While there is broad agreement about the need for change, the extent of the reduction in access fees and tick sizes will have a big impact on markets.
CME: CFTC OKs clearing move to Google Cloud
The CFTC has given the Chicago-based exchange approval to run its clearing and settlement infrastructure on the Google Cloud Platform, while the exchange and vendor have extended their partnership to last until at least 2037.
Cutting through the hype surrounding the FDTA rulemaking process
A bill requiring US regulators and institutions to adopt a machine-readable data framework for reporting purposes applies to entity identifiers, but not security identifiers, in a crucial difference, writes Scott Preiss, SVP and global head of Cusip Global Services.
Northern Trust offers internal fund accounting, data tools to clients
Regulations and a mandate to enhance quality and transparency in a bid to improve the investor experience are pushing buy-side firms to have more oversight of their third-party providers.
EU firms press for faster move to T+1 after smooth US rollout
Following the example set by North America, 70% of attendees at a European hearing on shorter settlement cycles favored a Q4 2027 switch to next-day settlement.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.