LEI Advocates Must Target Critical Mass
![nicholas-hamilton nicholas-hamilton](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/766/194766/nicholas-hamilton-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=j8oxjOCp)
The introduction of new regulations is a costly and complex business, but for vendors it also presents opportunities. As governments continue to respond to the faults highlighted by the global financial crisis, technology and data vendors are updating existing products and launching new ones to help their customers comply with new regulations.
Need to understand which trades are in scope for a new tax? There is a vendor who can help you with that. Looking for the most effective way to connect to a trade repository? Step right this way, I know just the solution for you. Struggling to assemble all the data needed for new regulatory reports? Don't worry about it, this new product will do the trick. And so on.
However, not all regions have been affected equally by the financial crisis and, as a result, not all regulators have rushed back to the drawing board with the same urgency.
At the Tokyo Financial Information Summit last week, delegates observed that Asia-Pacific is not in the midst of a regulatory overhaul on the scale of the one taking place in Europe and the US. One vendor said lack of regulatory change in the region has made it difficult to sell solutions there that are now considered essential ingredients for compliance in the US and Europe.
A tough trading environment for vendors is unlikely to raise much sympathy from other parts of the industry. However, countries' differing levels of exposure to the financial crisis and, therefore, appetite for change have more serious consequences too, particularly when it comes to the success of global regulatory projects such as the introduction of the legal entity identifier (LEI).
Japan has so far assumed an important role in the LEI project, through the appointment of Jun Mizuguchi of the Japanese Financial Services Agency as vice-chair of the LEI's Regulatory Oversight Committee. However, market participants have raised doubts about the Japanese authorities' enthusiasm for mandating the LEI and have pointed out that existing mechanisms for entity identification in the country are considered to function well.
However, even if no compelling reasons for adopting the LEI can be found internally in Japan, they will surely become quickly apparent when the new identifier starts to be widely used by other major economies. If Japan waits too long before adopting the LEI, its financial firms will be forced to maintain two identification systems – one for trading domestically and another for trading in jurisdictions that have adopted the LEI. This would be complex, costly and unpopular, and would no doubt force Japan to adopt the identifier.
All of which serves to remind those countries with the greatest interest in the LEI that the best way to increase adoption is to lead by example. The sooner a critical mass can be reached, the better.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher