Gensler Rebuffs Regulatory Reach Critics in FIA Keynote
During the course of his speech, Gensler highlighted the achievements of US regulatory agencies in finalizing and enacting Dodd-Frank reforms over swaps trading, saying that ideas were now becoming a reality. In addressing the need for offshore affiliates of US financial institutions, and foreign institutions operating in the US to comply with Dodd-Frank mandates, he said that previous incidents involving the collapse of firms showed that contagion effects did not respect national boundaries.
"Looking forward, it's a priority that the Commission ensures the cross-border application of swaps market reform appropriately covers the risk of US affiliates operating offshore. During a default, risk knows no geographic border," he said. "If a run starts in one part of a modern financial institution, whether it's here or offshore, the risk comes back to our shores. That was true with AIG, which ran most of its swaps business out of the London neighborhood Mayfair. It was also true at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup, Bear Stearns and Long-Term Capital Management."
Various industry groups have criticized the perceived extra-territorial reach of Dodd-Frank Act requirements, saying that their operations could fall under the purview of US regulators even if their business in the US is minimal. Foreign regulators have also voiced criticism of the approach, and market participants have even said that in order to comply with some Dodd-Frank mandates, they will be forced to break the law in their own country.
Analogous Regimes
Gensler said that where appropriate, foreign competent authority regulation would be considered. However, the essence of the argument is that events with the potential to affect US markets should fall under US auspices.
"Thus, as the CFTC completes the cross-border guidance, I believe it's critical that Dodd-Frank swaps reform applies to transactions entered into by branches of US institutions offshore, between guaranteed affiliates offshore, and for hedge funds that are incorporated offshore but operate in the US," he continued. "Where there are comparable and comprehensive home country rules abroad, we can look to substituted compliance, but the transactions would still be covered."
Where there are comparable and comprehensive home country rules abroad, we can look to substituted compliance, but the transactions would still be covered.
He encouraged foreign firms that would seek to substitute US compliance with that of their home regulator to contact the CFTC immediately.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
BlackRock, BNY see T+1 success in industry collaboration, old frameworks
Industry testing and lessons from the last settlement change from T+3 to T+2 were some of the components that made the May transition run smoothly.
How ‘Bond gadgets’ make tackling data easier for regulators and traders
The IMD Wrap: Everyone loves the hype around AI, especially financial firms. And now, even regulators are getting in on the act. But first... “The name’s Bond; J-AI-mes Bond”
Can the EU and UK reach T+1 together?
Prompted by the North American migration, both jurisdictions are drawing up guidelines for reaching next-day settlement.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 293: Reference Data Drama
Tony and Reb discuss the Financial Data Transparency Act's proposed rules around identifiers and the industry reaction.
Clearing houses fear being classified as DORA third parties
As the 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members are seeking risk information that’s usually deemed confidential.
Industry not sold on FIGI mandate for US reg reporting
Banks’ and asset managers’ tortured relationship with Cusip numbers remains tortured, as they tell regulators to keep the taxonomy in play.
T+1 shift sees out-of-hours human resourcing costs spike by as much as 20%
New research finds that trading firms are experiencing increased labor costs—which could be a boon for outsourced trading.
CBOE and Aquis to make bid for European equities tape
The challenger exchanges have plans to become the second public bidder for provider of the European equities tape, following EuroCTP’s incorporation last year.