Rob Daly: Saying Good-Bye to Awful 2011
![robdaly-headshot robdaly-headshot](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/762/101762/robdaly-headshot-580x358.png.webp?itok=vDU7KFE5)
One thing I’ve become intimately familiar with as a life-long fan of the Buffalo Bills American football team is the term “a building year.” I believe that 2011 has been a building year for the capital markets thanks to new regulations and rules meant to address the fallout from the 2008 credit crisis.
By mid-July 2011, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) were meant to have completed writing the new rules that would regulate the over-the-counter (OTC) swaps market under the terms of the Dodd–Frank Act. But that deadline came and went, leaving firms with the long and complex task of preparing their front-, middle- and back-office systems for a new market structure whose rules are still undefined.
Although the CFTC did publicly state that its goals are to have all of the rules in place by the end of the first quarter of 2012, it’s doubtful that the regulator will meet the new deadline, given the amount of heavy lifting that remains in defining the new market practices. At best, the US regulators might fall in line with the other Group of Twenty (G20) market regulators that have set the end of 2012 as the deadline to centrally clear these products.
Take Two
Europe should not feel left out in regulatory disappointment. The release of the review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II) demonstrates a basic lack of understanding of how to regulate high-frequency trading. The European Commission’s intentions to prevent algorithmic trading engines from creating or contributing to “disorderly trading conditions on the market” is rife with unaddressed issues, especially how it defines what high-frequency trading is. It proposes that markets use a ratio of executed and canceled trades, but it does not state what that ratio should be or who should determine it.
In the US, the SEC has taken a few steps to rein in high-frequency traders and their impact on the market. First, it has harmonized the circuit breakers on the US stock exchanges to prevent a repeat of the Flash Crash. It was a good move to address systemic risk in such a fragmented market, even though high-frequency trading was not the specific cause of the crash.
At press time, the SEC’s Rule 15c3-5, which requires pre-trade risk checks for broker-dealer clients that are trading via sponsored direct market access (DMA), was set to take effect. The rule seems to be a no-brainer for the brokers sponsoring their clients’ access as well as the market as a whole because no one benefits when traders go rouge.
Yet this seems to be a preemptive strike. I am not aware of a single trading situation in the market that the SEC can use as a precedent for this rule. It also seems, as I have mentioned in the past, half a standard, since the CFTC has not issued a similar rule. Given that many firms are trading multi-asset strategies, doing a risk check only on equities and equity options seems a bit short-sighted. Reading the rule, one is left feeling that the regulators would eventually like to see real-time synchronous cross-margin credit checks performed by the broker-dealers. Knowing the state of risk management systems, the regulators should expect to see asynchronous risk checks based on the individual lines of business.
Shrinking Budgets
Firms would love to have real-time risk-check capabilities across the enterprise, but much of the shrinking IT budget is tied up with keeping the lights on and preparing for the 90-day implementation period once the CFTC and SEC finalize the Dodd–Frank rules.
It would be nice to believe that the regulatory environment will change in the new year, but with the spectacular flameout of MF Global, Pipeline Trading’s troubles, and the growing popular discontent as embodied by Occupy Wall Street and its regional siblings, regulation and over-regulation will be the norm in 2012.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.
This Week: FCA, Plato/Turquoise, Franklin Templeton, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Insurers deny cyber premiums are rising
Contrary to banks’ complaints, underwriters and brokers claim current market for policies is soft.
Size matters: US equity market players wrangle over new tick size regime
The industry expects the SEC to finalize the Reg NMS shake-up as soon as late summer. While there is broad agreement about the need for change, the extent of the reduction in access fees and tick sizes will have a big impact on markets.
CME: CFTC OKs clearing move to Google Cloud
The CFTC has given the Chicago-based exchange approval to run its clearing and settlement infrastructure on the Google Cloud Platform, while the exchange and vendor have extended their partnership to last until at least 2037.
Cutting through the hype surrounding the FDTA rulemaking process
A bill requiring US regulators and institutions to adopt a machine-readable data framework for reporting purposes applies to entity identifiers, but not security identifiers, in a crucial difference, writes Scott Preiss, SVP and global head of Cusip Global Services.