Another Step in the Right Direction?
![victor-anderson-bst-awards-2011 victor-anderson-bst-awards-2011](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/208/201208/victor-anderson-bst-awards-2011-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=6OUuOtpY)
On Thursday October 20, the European Commission unveiled its long-awaited Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (Mifid II) proposals, a series of updates to the original Mifid regulatory framework released by Brussels in November 2007.
The primary objectives of the Directive, which replaced the anachronistic Investment Services Directive, were to increase competition and consumer protection throughout the Pan-European marketplace by fostering a culture of transparency and accountability. I think it's fair to say that Mifid has, by and large, been well received by all constituents, and it's gone a long way to achieving the ideals for which it was originally conceived. But now, thanks to the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), established by the European Commission in June 2001, there's a new 195-page document to decipher and digest.
Article 17 of the new Directive, the chapter pertaining to algorithmic trading ─ and therefore, by association, high-frequency trading too ─ includes a number of risk management clauses; a section on transparency into the "parameters" of firms' trading algorithms, which effectively need to be "ratified" on an annual basis by their "home Competent Authority", although how, for example, the UK's Financial Services Authority will go about ratifying algorithms developed and implemented by UK-based financial services firms without having to employ a small army of quants, is anyone's guess; and effective controls with respect to sponsored access for institutional investors and direct market access.
However, the most far-reaching developments pertain to rules requiring firms to leave their trading algorithms "on" during market hours. The proposal reads: "An algorithmic trading strategy shall be in continuous operation during the trading hours of the trading venue to which it sends orders or through the systems of which it executes transactions. The trading parameters or limits of an algorithmic trading strategy shall ensure that the strategy posts firm quotes at competitive prices with the result of providing liquidity on a regular and ongoing basis to these trading venues at all times, regardless of prevailing market conditions."
That's all good and well, but what does this mean for market participants and what is the CESR's reason for such a development? In short, it is Brussels' preemptive strike to ensure two things: that first and foremost, an event similar to the May 2010 Flash Crash in the US market isn't repeated in Europe; and second, it's a way of guaranteeing deep, reliable liquidity throughout the trading day, effectively mitigating the risk of liquidity droughts during periods of extreme volatility.
The Mifid II proposals appear, at this stage, to have garnered a positive response from the industry on this side of the Atlantic, and, although a lot of the fine-print still needs to be more fully considered on a practical level, it appears to be another step in the right direction.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.
This Week: FCA, Plato/Turquoise, Franklin Templeton, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.