Identifying a Winner
When I was in New York in November last year, a reference data expert told me he already knew what the 2011 reference data buzz word would be‹the Office of Financial Research (OFR). So far, I would say he¹s spot on.
The OFR¹s call for universal business entity identification has been the top conversation-starter this month. The industry had until the end of January to respond to the statement from the OFR, and the comment letters have now been made public. There appears to be agreement that the industry needs a unique global identifier for legal entities‹something that has been discussed for more than a decade. But there continues to be little agreement on how to solve the problem.
Most organizations are betting on their own horse. The main contenders are:
the issuer and guarantor identifier, which is currently going through the ISO process; the Cabre identifier, which was developed by Cusip Global Services and Avox last year; the BIC code, which Swift has suggested changing and extending to cover all legal entities; and the GS1 global business entity identifier, a standard based on the existing global location number scheme.
In my view, the bookie¹s favourite would have to be Swift¹s BIC code‹or that¹s at least the one I¹ve heard most people talk about. The BIC option is also highlighted in the response from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, as Swift and DTCC could potentially work together if Swift assigns the legal entity identifier and DTCC builds the utility to make it and other core data elements accessible to the public.
But the race is still on. The BIC benefits and development might be well-known in the industry, but the IGI could soon become an ISO standard; Cusip has stressed how Cabre has been created to meet the immediate market need; and the GS1 proposition is based on a standard issuers are already familiar with.
The favourite wins in around one-third of horse races, but in the race to become the legal entity identifier of choice the outcome is still difficult to predict. Many industry veterans keep their bets secret in the responses to the OFR. Instead, they go on to explain how the industry has tried solving this problem before, and some go into detail on why the industry needs a legal identifier.
Last time I checked, there were more than 30 of these letters to the OFR, and one is actually 170 pages long. It looks like the passion in the reference data industry will keep the US Treasury and the OFR busy in the near future. The plan now is that they have until mid-July to review the horses¹ forms, and it is not before then that the industry expects to get the news on who takes the legal entity identification trophy. May the best horse win.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.
This Week: FCA, Plato/Turquoise, Franklin Templeton, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Insurers deny cyber premiums are rising
Contrary to banks’ complaints, underwriters and brokers claim current market for policies is soft.
Size matters: US equity market players wrangle over new tick size regime
The industry expects the SEC to finalize the Reg NMS shake-up as soon as late summer. While there is broad agreement about the need for change, the extent of the reduction in access fees and tick sizes will have a big impact on markets.
CME: CFTC OKs clearing move to Google Cloud
The CFTC has given the Chicago-based exchange approval to run its clearing and settlement infrastructure on the Google Cloud Platform, while the exchange and vendor have extended their partnership to last until at least 2037.
Cutting through the hype surrounding the FDTA rulemaking process
A bill requiring US regulators and institutions to adopt a machine-readable data framework for reporting purposes applies to entity identifiers, but not security identifiers, in a crucial difference, writes Scott Preiss, SVP and global head of Cusip Global Services.