2011 Preview Part II – New Regulation
![victor-anderson-waters victor-anderson-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/004/107004/victor-anderson-waters-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=UPHh0G3n)
If you had to do an informal poll of our industry in order to ascertain people's expectations for the year ahead, there's one word that would crop up more often than any other: regulation.
Okay, so not everyone expects significant new regulations to be introduced across every facet of the financial services industry, but I think all would concede that certain regulatory changes are necessary and likely, and that the market is pretty much ripe for it.
But that's only half the story. The really interesting part of this discussion comes about when you ask people to articulate the specifics of the types of regulations likely to be introduced. Indeed, one of the most prominent themes at this year's Waters USA conference held in New York on December 6, was that relating to what the new regulations might look like and when they might be introduced. Members of our CIOs' panel discussion, most of whom have regular contact with the industry's regulators on both sides of the Atlantic, were undecided as to what the regulatory landscape might look like in a year's time. It seems, for the moment at least, that everyone is equally in the dark.
So, at the risk of being exposed for my inadequate anticipatory powers, below is what I think will happen on the regulatory front during 2011:
1. I think we're unlikely to see any regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission in the US attempting to curtail high-frequency trading activities (and by association algorithmic trading) in the wake of the Flash Crash. The SEC might want to introduce new measures to ‘slow down' the markets, but I think even it would concede that talking about regulating such activities and actually implementing regulations around them are two different things. How, for example, would the SEC go about deciding how fast is too fast?
2. I think the main thrust of the 2011 regulatory drive will surround the business activities impacted by the Dodd Frank Act, which, when you scratch a little below its not-insubstantial surface, is pretty much everything. Most firms are still coming to terms with the extent of the Act and how it might impact their day-to-day lives.
3. We're likely to see a lot more written and discussed about the introduction of central clearing counterparties in the OTC derivatives markets as a way of increasing efficiencies and operational resilience, while also potentially reducing various risks associated with the trading of such instruments, especially when it comes to credit derivatives. This facet of the capital markets is simply too important for regulators to continue to ignore.
4. The European market is likely to see quite a bit of speculation about Mifid II and what the ‘review' might mean to market participants in the region. Whether any substantial regulation is likely to be spawned as a result of the review is unclear, although it's unlikely that anything resembling the original Mifid requirements will be forthcoming.
5. Finally, the way that regulations tend to be introduced - proposals, feedback periods, speculation, criticism of the regulators by market participants, frustration and only then the introduction of the final rules themselves - means that there will be a lot of time for firms to get used to the idea of having to comply with new mandates. Also, if the past is anything to go by, there tends to be a marked difference between what is initially proposed and what is finally introduced by the regulators.
New regulations are inevitable - they are a necessary evil and an integral part of the capital markets that all participants need to negotiate - and complying with such operational mandates can have a significant impact on firms' technology infrastructures. Those firms with the most operational and technological flexibility will find such moves the least disruptive.
Next time: Risk Management (please note that the publication of this piece depends on the snow conditions in Morzine, France).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.