LEI's Big Payoff
![michael-shashoua-waters michael-shashoua-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/317/167317/michael-shashoua-waters.JPG.webp?h=acfe3244&itok=ceJMABf4)
After years of following the ongoing story of the legal entity identifier (LEI) - from setting its characteristics and setting up all the administrative bodies that would administer it - the stories in this month's issue of Inside Reference Data show that positive impacts of its implementation are starting to appear.
While that implementation may not be totally complete, industry professionals are actually eager to have the regulatory mandate pushing the LEI's adoption, as reported in "Securing LEI Success." Regulatory imposition of the LEI, as industry lobby Sifma has called for, would actually ensure that more LEIs exist to enter into firms' systems, says CIBC's Allie Harris. Citi's Ari Marcus echoes that sentiment, saying regulators should require LEIs to be used in regulatory filings. This would promote adoption of the LEI and ensure that firms are compliant as long as they "follow the mandate," which would remove a lot of uncertainty and concern, Marcus says.
Although the US Internal Revenue Service recently declined to include the LEI in implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (Fatca), Matthew Reed of the US Treasury's Office of Financial Research held out hope that the LEI may be added as an official identifier for Fatca later. And, as Marcus says in a more detailed account of Citi's experience with the LEI, his firm has been able to adopt centralized systems, which improve its risk management.
With all the value on the horizon or already here as a result of the LEI, one wonders if Fatca or the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's BCBS 239 risk data aggregation principles will have similar benefits and whether such benefits will be recognized. It's certainly possible with BCBS 239, as UBS's Simon Feddo says in "Stress Emphasis." Feddo recognizes benefits that the LEI had for risk data aggregation, and suggests that the BCBS 239 principles have helped spur his firm to make linkages between data on clients, accounts and trading agreements.
Certainly, when it comes to Fatca, which has become the elephant in the room for the industry as its July 1 deadline nears, the regulation has driven changes in the way data operations are conducted, as described in "Last Orders," an account of the discussion from a webcast held on May 28. Barclays' Mark Gilmartin related that data quality improvements are occurring because of the data aggregation and consolidation work being undertaken for Fatca compliance. Client onboarding operations, while not considered as crucial by respondents to a poll taken in the webcast, are also getting more funding, because the root cause of data issues relevant to Fatca compliance should be addressed from the beginning, said Informatica's Peter Ku.
Whatever the reasoning, any effort to improve data quality and make data more consistent should do more good than harm. Whether that's driven by the LEI, Fatca, BCBS 239 or something else, regulation and standards efforts are generating value in unexpected ways.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher
Hong Kong looks for digital response to trade reporting burden
New swaps reporting framework will include more fields than requirements in US or Singapore.
Big questions remain over Dora’s critical third parties
Industry looks for clarity on critical third parties ahead of July 17 regulatory technical standards for the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act.