Growing Gravity For Collateral and C-Level Execs
![michael-shashoua-waters michael-shashoua-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/317/167317/michael-shashoua-waters.JPG.webp?h=acfe3244&itok=ceJMABf4)
Collateral considerations are the focus for two features in the June issue of Inside Reference Data. Having established that collateral transactions and the data they produce are increasing, and that more firms are trying to manage or better manage collateral data, we're hearing more about the importance of collateral transactions and data, particularly in terms of risk management and gaining a competitive edge.
In "Putting a Value on Collateral," Nicholas Hamilton reports how Anthony Belcher of Interactive Data has called for industry participants to start setting policies and procedures for sourcing collateral valuations and deciding what valuations data is acceptable. Firms should not wait for confirmation of which collateral instruments will possibly be cleared centrally under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (Emir), Belcher adds.
To begin with, calculation of the amount of collateral, or margin, that must be posted has to be reliable. Central counterparties must exercise care and deliberation about prices and valuations, which will inform those calculations, says Marcus Zickwolff of the European Association of Central Counterparty Clearing Houses.
Central counterparties can be more efficient at cross-margining, Deutsche Bank's Bradley Foster says in the other feature on collateral data processing improvements. With new rules and mandates, especially initial margin requirements, affecting liquidity, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and Euroclear are working on a Margin Transit Utility aimed at facilitating the straight-through processing of collateral transactions and the eradication of process inefficiencies (and ensuing illiquidity) that could be exacerbated by the need to collect collateral more often. The growth of collateral data is also raising questions about transparency, outsourcing and regional differences for management.
Last month, IRD considered the rise of the chief data officer. This month, we look at other trends in management and organizational development that can affect how reference data is processed and used.
In "Governing Data Governance," we hear from some of those C-level data or information executives about how firms' data governance concerns are best served by giving them the authority to develop governance methods, policies and procedures.
Finally, in this month's "Interview With," Nomura's Brian Buzzelli sets out some caveats about two popular data management methods, enterprise data management and drawing on cloud resources. His comments just go to show that chief data officers, or those with equivalent titles, can sometimes take a leadership role by bucking the conventional wisdom.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Waters Wavelength Ep. 305: Cato Institute's Jennifer Schulp
Jennifer joins to discuss what regulatory priorities might look under Paul Atkin's SEC.
Examining Cboe’s lawsuit appealing SEC’s OEMS rule rejection
The Chicago-based exchange has sued the regulator in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals after the agency blocked a proposed rule that would change how Silexx is classified.
European exchange data prices surge, new study shows
The report analyzed market data prices and fee structures from 2017 to 2024 and found that fee schedules have increased exponentially. Several exchanges say the findings are misleading.
Regis-TR and the Emir Refit blame game
The reporting overhaul was been marred by problems at repositories, prompting calls to stagger future go-live dates.
FCA: Consolidated tape for UK equities won’t happen until 2028
At an event last week, the FCA proposed a new timeline for the CT, which received pushback from participants, according to sources.
Cusip Global Services wants to know, ‘What’s your damage?’
The evidence and discovery phase of the case against the identifier bureau is set to expire in March, bringing an anticipated jury trial one step closer.
Big questions linger as DORA compliance approaches
The major EU regulation will go live tomorrow. Outstanding clarifications and confusion around the definition of an ICT service, penetration testing, subcontracting, and more remain.
Insurance: The role of risktech in effectively managing emerging risks and driving competitive edge
This whitepaper covers the global survey, conducted by Chartis Research and TCS, of banking, financial services and insurance firms, which found that insurers are struggling to adapt to evolving risks and regulatory requirement increases. Chartis offers…