New Urgency For Data Aggregation
![michael-shashoua-waters michael-shashoua-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/317/167317/michael-shashoua-waters.JPG.webp?h=acfe3244&itok=ceJMABf4)
Last week in this space, I posed the question of what the impact would be of a likely delay to implementation of the Basel III capital adequacy proposal. Aside from other questions coming out of Basel [the town rather than its namesake regulation proposal] this past week about the legal entity identifier, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's (BCBS) recent risk data and reporting consultation paper is raising the prospect of still more demands on data operations in financial services.
BCBS has set out a timeline for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), beginning with self-assessment in 2013 and leading to completed risk data aggregation and risk reporting by 2016. A Deloitte report on the requirements of this three-year process points to management roles, changes needed in processes and technology, and improvements in data quality.
Data supporting risk metrics, coming from counterparty data, legal entity hierarchies, book data, trade data and pricing, must be "of sufficient quality," the authors of the report say. G-SIBs' relevant reference data is shared across numerous functions, they stress, and needs an accountable owner who can make needed changes in process and technology. That points to getting the data problem addressed at the chief executive level of the G-SIBs, according to the Deloitte report, with a chief data officer—or at least for those that do not have a CDO, a chief technology officer or chief information officer—who appreciates the importance of data in this effort.
Regardless of what path G-SIBs choose to comply with BCBS-mandated risk data aggregation requirements, the Deloitte authors stress that the BCBS consultation paper is a wake-up call to those firms to assess their risk operating models and data management functions. Those that do so first and best will have a competitive advantage.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher
Hong Kong looks for digital response to trade reporting burden
New swaps reporting framework will include more fields than requirements in US or Singapore.
Big questions remain over Dora’s critical third parties
Industry looks for clarity on critical third parties ahead of July 17 regulatory technical standards for the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act.
Most read
- Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
- Natixis refines in-house interoperability model
- IEX Cloud closure forces fintech clients to seek data alternatives