A Slow Shift to ISO 20022
Strapline: Golden Copy

At last year's Sibos conference in Amsterdam, the Standards Forum, designed to promote the adoption of ISO 20022 and educate users to better understand this securities messaging standard, attracted a lot of traffic and attention. This month, when Sibos comes to Toronto, the Standards Forum promises to again attract a lot of interest at the conference.
Swift has fought an uphill battle to promote adoption of ISO 20022, which was first introduced in 2004. In July, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation announced a re-engineering initiative that could be one spur to encourage adoption of 20022. There is no sunset date set for the older standard, ISO 15022, and even some Swift members don't want to end it because of its familiarity and other factors of convenience.
As reported in one of the features in this issue, Setting Standards in Stone, Swift is addressing its challenge of showing the industry a convincing business case for moving to 20022. Firms want a shorter return-on-investment time for making this change, and as an executive for service provider XSP says, "it is going to have to be the business user that pushes for this." Still, Euroclear's Edwin De Pauw, who adds his perspective to this story, as well as this month's "Interview With" column, says the focus of the Standards Forum should be the practical issues involved in moving to ISO messaging. De Pauw and colleagues from the industry will address this idea in numerous sessions during the Forum.
De Pauw also highlights the fact that ISO messaging has increased, which could support the move to 20022, and stresses that firms moving to ISO messaging should make that move to 20022 specifically, combining any business cases that may be separate. Swift itself has a MyStandards platform initiative, covered on page 5 of this issue, intended to provide a single point of access to all message types and the 20022 standard, connecting these to market practices and analytical frameworks.
The most valuable portion of the Standards Forum could be one entitled "Leveraging ISO 20022 as a business standard," scheduled for 10 am, September 20. If the business case is so important to promoting adoption of 20022, hearing views from IBM and Swift itself on how this can be achieved might be the best way for industry users to decide for themselves, or be truly convinced of the need to migrate. Another session in the Forum, "Let's get practical: Transforming Swift standards," extends the promise that Swift will streamline its development and maintenance of standards.
After more than six years, the question now regarding ISO 20022 is where the tipping point is for its adoption to become universal, or if it will even have such a milestone. This year's Standards Forum points to some key possibilities which can be leveraged to that end and some efforts, like those made by DTCC, that could be decisive. Will the same concerns still be on the agenda next year?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Experts say HKEX’s plan for T+1 in 2025 is ‘sensible’
The exchange will continue providing core post-trade processing through CCASS but will engage with market participants on the service’s future as HKEX rolls out new OCP features.
No, no, no, and no: Overnight trading fails in SIP votes
The CTA and UTP operating committees voted yesterday on proposals from US exchanges to expand their trading hours and could not reach unanimous consensus.
Big xyt exploring bid to provide EU equities CT
So far, only one group, a consortium of the major European exchanges, has formally kept its hat in the ring to provide Europe’s consolidated tape for equities.
Jump Trading CIO: 24/7 trading ‘inevitable’
Execs from Jump, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and the DTCC say round-the-clock trading—whether five or seven days a week—is the future, but tech and data hurdles still exist.
Pisces season: Platform providers feed UK plan for private stock market
Several companies in the US and the UK are considering participating in a UK program to build a private stock market composed of separate trading platforms.
How to navigate regional nuances that complicate T+1 in Europe
European and UK firms face unique challenges in moving to T+1 settlement, writes Broadridge’s Carl Bennett, and they will need to follow a series of steps to ensure successful adoption by 2027.
Nasdaq leads push to reform options regulatory fee
A proposed rule change would pare costs for traders, raise them for banks, and defund smaller venues.
The CAT declawed as Citadel’s case reaches end game
The SEC reduced the CAT’s capacity to collect information on investors, in a move that will have knock-on effects for its ongoing funding model case with Citadel.