MiFID II Delay: Not an Opportunity to Relax
Regulatory reporting expert urges firms to start planning compliance strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c125e/c125ec8288d9c8ddb8534f338a8ae8375aab8149" alt="cian cian"
No doubt there was a collective sigh of relief from firms in Europe when regulators announced a year's delay to the implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID).
But this is no time to sit back and relax, say experts.
"It's inevitable that whenever the word ‘delay' or postponement is used, there's a natural temptation to ease off and become complacent, because firms now have 24 months to complete the project," says Cian O'Braonáin, global regulatory reporting practise lead at Sapient Global Markets in London.
"That's incredibly dangerous, because the extra time should be used to understand the complexity, the IT requirements and also testing and re-testing to ensure reporting completeness and accuracy."
According to Sapient's polling of 500 industry participants during a recent webinar, says O'Braonáin, only 10% considered themselves "very ready" to face the forthcoming regulation.
"Our survey found that 50% of firms cited either a lack of internal data governance or poor data quality as the biggest challenge they face in preparing for MiFID II compliance, while another 17% said poor technology and manual processes are their main hurdles."
Some 52% plan on leveraging their existing reporting infrastructure to comply with MiFID II reporting requirements. "This means despite recognizing their own deficiencies, they still plan to utilize those same support systems," says O'Braonáin. "This will only set organizations back."
But it's not too late for firms to devise a strategy for MiFID II, says O'Braonáin.
"The delay is an opportunity to invest in new ways of doing things. I would hope that the additional time means firms move away from the more tactical approaches of implementing and stringing together multiple point solutions, to a more strategic view. Some firms are already going down that route, but there's now an opportunity to take a more considered and planned approach to the regulation."
MiFID II reporting—and more regulatory issues—are on the agenda at the European Regulation Roadshow, which will be held in Paris on March 17 and is hosted by HSBC Securities Services, as well as Inside Reference Data, Inside Market Data and Waters Technology. Click here for the agenda.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
How to navigate regional nuances that complicate T+1 in Europe
European and UK firms face unique challenges in moving to T+1 settlement, writes Broadridge’s Carl Bennett, and they will need to follow a series of steps to ensure successful adoption by 2027.
Nasdaq leads push to reform options regulatory fee
A proposed rule change would pare costs for traders, raise them for banks, and defund smaller venues.
The CAT declawed as Citadel’s case reaches end game
The SEC reduced the CAT’s capacity to collect information on investors, in a move that will have knock-on effects for its ongoing funding model case with Citadel.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 305: Cato Institute's Jennifer Schulp
Jennifer joins to discuss what regulatory priorities might look under Paul Atkin's SEC.
Examining Cboe’s lawsuit appealing SEC’s OEMS rule rejection
The Chicago-based exchange has sued the regulator in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals after the agency blocked a proposed rule that would change how Silexx is classified.
European exchange data prices surge, new study shows
The report analyzed market data prices and fee structures from 2017 to 2024 and found that fee schedules have increased exponentially. Several exchanges say the findings are misleading.
Regis-TR and the Emir Refit blame game
The reporting overhaul was been marred by problems at repositories, prompting calls to stagger future go-live dates.
FCA: Consolidated tape for UK equities won’t happen until 2028
At an event last week, the FCA proposed a new timeline for the CT, which received pushback from participants, according to sources.