ICE Committed to Keeping $650 Million Trayport Platform

Intercontinental Exchange slaps down CMA suggestion of divestiture of Trayport platform, confirms intentions to carry on unchanged.

atlanta
Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, IntercontinentalExchange acquired Trayport in December 2015 for $650 million.

The Atlanta-based exchange operator said in a statement that it refuted the CMA's initial investigatory findings that the acquisition of the Trayport platform in December 2015 could lead to a lessening of competition.

In response to the watchdog's remedy proposal of complete divestiture of the platform, ICE said the idea was not "necessary, appropriate or in the best interests of Trayport's customers. ICE is committed to retaining ownership of Trayport and is willing to memorialize its intentions with regard to Trayport's future operation with formal CMA remedies."

While the CMA highlighted that ICE would be able to divert trades to its own platforms, as well as increasing fees for execution and clearing, as a direct result of its acquisition of Trayport, it would be open to the exchange operator changing the nature of the platform as a solution.

However ICE also rejected that compromise, stating that the Trayport platform would "continue to operate as it does today in European utilities markets and will ensure that brokers, exchanges and clearing houses are all treated fairly and reasonably."

"The findings are provisional and the final CMA decision is not expected to be known until mid-October", said the statement. "ICE now has an opportunity to address the CMA's concerns and demonstrate how they do not reflect the manner in which Trayport will operate as a subsidiary of ICE."

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Banks seemingly build more than buy, but why?

Waters Wrap: A new report states that banks are increasingly enticed by the idea of building systems in-house, versus being locked into a long-term vendor contract. Anthony explores the reason for this shift.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here