Is The Pricing Right?
Making sure you know the sources of your pricing data seems like an obvious no-brainer, but I've been thinking about this topic this week and finding that data users are currently thinking about it as well, and working on how to get transparency on sourcing of prices.
Structured products and mortgages and their opacity have created another challenge for getting transparency on pricing sources, a valuations executive at one of the largest data providers said during our North American Financial Information Summit (NAFIS) at the beginning of this summer. The firms themselves need to distribute pricing data into multiple lines of business and are usually obtaining it from multiple sources. Documenting their data methodology is therefore important, but so is vetting data providers and the relationships being established with those providers, according to a pricing manager speaking at the same event.
Above all, firms want pricing handled in a uniform and consistent fashion, said a fixed-income business executive at another firm. Firms are also turning to data quality assessments, as performed by providers such as Markit, to determine the accuracy of pricing coming from major providers, as Daniel Johnson, director of valuations at Lacrosse Fund Services, observed to me more recently. The data quality assessment becomes especially important if you have only one source of prices.
That source certainly shouldn't be a fund manager, Johnson cautions. "Any investor who's over-reliant on prices coming from a manager needs to be reminded of people like Bernie Madoff," he says. "Investor money should go toward independent pricing managers. If you're basing your pricing on the manager, you should expect to pay a higher risk premium." Johnson does see more investors pushing managers to establish and follow best practices in pricing over the next 18 months.
Still, firms that want to have three, four or multiple sources of pricing data available to them are concerned about costs, as that pricing manager speaking at NAFIS related. "It's a constant battle between the balance sheet and the transparency," said Paul Sharkey, a vice president at Northern Trust.
With that in mind, the obvious conclusion, at least from this perspective, is there may be costs to cover having multiple pricing sources and doing due diligence on each of them, but those are bound to be a lot less than the cost of pricing errors that get discovered too late, or a wider systemic failure in pricing accuracy. It's always better to spend a bit more up front and save a lot more as a result later on, whatever the endeavor.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
$135.6m fines prompt Citi to modernize infrastructure, controls
The bank was hit with a combined $135.6 million fine on Wednesday for failing to resolve “longstanding internal controls and risk issues,” amid continued internal work across the enterprise.
SocGen pushes data, analytics use cases for SG Markets
The bank is letting a handful of clients experiment with its proprietary data and models to inform their research.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
The IMD Wrap: It’s the data, Cupid!
As BlackRock buys Preqin, and LSEG strikes a data deal with Dow Jones, Max notes that in data, strange bedfellows breed valuable offspring.
This Week: BlackRock/Preqin, Trading Technologies, FIA Tech and more
A summary of some of the past week’s financial technology news.
US banks seek to open vendors’ black box on green data
Inaugural Fed climate scenario analysis flags lack of transparency around third-party models.
IEX Cloud closure forces fintech clients to seek data alternatives
IEX says it is ditching its unprofitable data arm to focus on its core exchange business, but other vendors believe they can turn a profit from its former client base of fintechs, retail investors and some institutions.