Michael Shashoua: The Ides Arrive Early

Last month’s launch of the International Data Exchange Service (IDES) by the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) seems intended to address past complaints that the IRS was not adequately defining what would be required for compliance with the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (Fatca). IDES allows firms and national authorities that have entered intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) with the IRS to securely report relevant account data. The service also lets firms securely exchange information with each other, whether they have IGAs or not.
Preceding IDES’ debut, foreign financial firms had to obtain a GIIN identification number by July 1, 2014, in countries without IGAs, and by January 1, 2015, in countries with IGAs. Next, firms must meet new annual reporting deadlines in March and September this year, raising the question of whether IDES will be sufficiently easy to navigate and functional enough to allow that to happen. Firms in markets without IGAs must report by March 31, while firms in markets with IGAs have until September 30.
Further Adjustments?
In a column last March, I asked if the IRS might have further adjustments to what had been a February deadline for having reporting processes and customer remediation in place. IDES does not reportedly include any such major changes to the substance of what firms must file and provide for Fatca compliance, so that appears settled now.
However, as Micah Willbrand, global director of anti-money laundering product marketing at Nice Actimize, points out, from a technological and operational perspective, the IDES rollout is likely to strain firms’ ability to meet the March and September deadlines. The intent behind IDES is to give firms a tool to meet the deadlines with the resources they have, Willbrand says, although it could become trial-by-fire with the first-ever annual reporting cycle, using a new, untested system.
Corporate Actions Interest
Meanwhile, as my colleagues and I prepare for this year’s Financial Information Summits, we consider whether corporate actions has enough interesting or important developments happening to warrant discussion. The question of the importance of corporate actions is particularly of interest for the North American Financial Information Summit to be held in New York in May.
IDES allows firms and national authorities that have entered IGAs with the IRS to securely report relevant account data.
Organizations like the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC), which has an interest in addressing corporate actions as a data management challenge, will see a lot of action happening in the field. However, because corporate actions are considered a back-office responsibility, other organizations end up seeing them as the crazy aunt in the basement—US presidential candidate Ross Perot’s term for what everyone knows is there but no one wants to acknowledge.
Part of the problem could be that the industry has gotten hung up on the sub-topic of corporate actions messaging standards, and whether a bigger swath of the industry will adopt the more advanced ISO 20022 standard. What appears to be more material, and more important to actually making corporate actions more compelling as an area to address, is growing sophistication in the number of fields included in a corporate action, and issues that could be created by discrepancies in the same data elements from different sources.
Also, increased volume and complexity ought to be sparking greater interest, just as that development did with legal entity identifiers, when their registration started driving new volumes of data to manage.
Industry professionals began speaking more about the new complexity in corporate actions last autumn, and told listeners of our October 29 webcast how this complexity will make efficiency and optimization of corporate actions processing more challenging. It remains to be seen whether it’s so challenging that it captures more interest in the industry.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Asic probe piles pressure on ASX to deliver Chess replacement
But market insiders think late intervention by regulators could even slow down implementation.
Stakes raised for UK bond, EU derivatives tapes after Ediphy clinches win
The pressure is on for TransFICC, Etrading, Finbourne, and Propellant Digital, who are still vying to provide the UK’s fixed income consolidated tape after Esma awarded the EU’s tape to Ediphy and its partners.
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.