July 2013: The Tail Wagging the Dog

Incisive Media in London recently entered an interesting phase in its history: The majority of the firm’s London-based staff members are currently based in its Soho office, having steadily relocated there from Haymarket House, half a mile down the road, over the past three years. Now, that entire process is set to be reversed, and everyone will, sooner or later, once again be housed in the Haymarket office. This transitional period has provided the firm’s management team with a rare opportunity to undertake a technology and operational audit that is likely to result in everyone changing the way they work. Technology, naturally, plays the key role in enabling people to work more efficiently and flexibly, to the extent that now more and more employees are coming around to the way my colleague, Jake Thomases, recently described the concept of work: “Work is something you do, not a place you go to,” Jake explained. That pretty much hits the nail on the head, right?
But, like just about everything in life, there’s a catch—a number of employees, including me, have been testing out a range of new technologies, designed to free us from Incisive Media’s current model—where every employee has their own designated desk—in favor of a flexible, “hot-desking” set-up. As previously mentioned, technology plays the pivotal role in this new model, acting as the catalyst for change. But, as Sod’s law—or Murphy’s law, as it is known across the pond—would have it, the technology we’re trialing is acting as an inhibitor to change, although perhaps this is to be expected, considering that the bulk of it is cutting-edge and we’re mostly unfamiliar with it. However, given that the technology has been selected for us by our technology team rather than by us, the end-users, I can’t help but feel that in this instance, the tail is definitely wagging the dog, a scenario not unfamiliar to capital markets end-users. But I suppose that is the point of trial periods and user-acceptance testing.
A decade ago, it wasn’t uncommon to hear stories from end-users at buy-side and sell-side firms complaining that the systems they were using were forced on them by their technology teams, and that if they had been consulted regarding the functionality that they felt was essential for them to do their jobs to the best of their abilities, the technology would look a whole lot different. Of course, those conversations have become fewer and farther between, thanks to financial services firms learning from their mistakes. Now, when it comes to new technologies, especially those that impact end-users’ day-to-day lives, the standard operating model involves the business—the end-users themselves—dictating the look, feel and functionality of the system they require, while the technology team focuses on building or buying the application with the required ingredients.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
DeepSeek success spurs banks to consider do-it-yourself AI
Chinese LLM resets price tag for in-house systems—and could also nudge banks towards open-source models.
Standard Chartered goes from spectator to player in digital asset game
The bank’s digital assets custody offering is underpinned by an open API and modular infrastructure, allowing it to potentially add a secondary back-end system provider.
Saugata Saha pilots S&P’s way through data interoperability, AI
Saha, who was named president of S&P Global Market Intelligence last year, details how the company is looking at enterprise data and the success of its early investments in AI.
Data partnerships, outsourced trading, developer wins, Studio Ghibli, and more
The Waters Cooler: CME and Google Cloud reach second base, Visible Alpha settles in at S&P, and another overnight trading venue is approved in this week’s news round-up.
Are we really moving on from GenAI already?
Waters Wrap: Agentic AI is becoming an increasingly hot topic, but Anthony says that shouldn’t come at the expense of generative AI.
Cloud infrastructure’s role in agentic AI
The financial services industry’s AI-driven future will require even greater reliance on cloud. A well-architected framework is key, write IBM’s Gautam Kumar and Raja Basu.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 310: SigTech’s Bin Ren
This week, SigTech’s CEO Bin Ren joins Eliot to discuss GenAI’s progress since ChatGPT’s emergence in 2022, agentic AI, and challenges with regulating AI.
Microsoft exec: ‘Generative AI is completely passé. This is the year of agentic AI’
Microsoft’s Symon Garfield said that AI advancements are prompting financial services firms to change their approach to integrating AI-powered solutions.