London Stock Exchange-Deutsche Börse Merger Suffers Potentially Terminal Setback
LSEG refuses European Commission’s antitrust demand to sell stake in Italian platform MTS, placing proposed merger in jeopardy.
In a statement released on February 26, LSEG said it “could not commit” to a divestment of MTS, a regulated electronic trading platform for European wholesale government bonds and other fixed-income securities.
The European Commission had made the divestment recommendation in mid-February in conjunction with a previous requirement that LSEG sell its stake in French clearing house LCH SA. A deal to sell LCH SA to European exchange rival Euronext was announced in January this year.
“The LSEG board believes that it is highly unlikely that a sale of MTS could be satisfactorily achieved, even if LSEG were to give the commitment,” said LSEG’s statement. “Moreover, the LSEG board believes the offer of such a remedy would jeopardize LSEG’s critically important relationships with these regulators and be detrimental to LSEG’s ongoing businesses in Italy and the combined group, were the merger to complete.”
LSEG has said that it will not propose a remedy to the European Commission’s demand and therefore “believes that the Commission is unlikely to provide clearance for the merger” with Deutsche Börse, but will continue its efforts to implement the deal.
A combined LSEG-Deutsche Börse entity would possess the clout to rival international exchange rivals such as Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and CME Group in the US, but has met with continued resistance from European regulators and competitors, fearing the creation of a European exchange monopoly. The UK’s decision to leave the European Union also created tension between the two exchanges as to where the combined group’s headquarters would be located.
By rejecting the European Commission’s antitrust demand, LSEG looks to have walked away from the proposed merger, despite insisting that it would continue to look for ways to push ahead with the merger and remains convinced of its “strategic benefits.”
However, LSEG was also bullish on its own prospects should the merger collapse, saying in the statement that it is “highly confident in the strength of LSEG’s business, strategy and prospects on a standalone basis” and expects to report “strong progress across all business areas” within its preliminary year end results on March 3.
Should LSEG officially withdraw its interest in the merger, the path may be open for non-European rivals to make an approach for either group; in March last year, a statement from ICE announced the possibility of a counter bid for LSEG, although no formal offer was made.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project