BoA Merrill Lynch Handed $12.5 Million Fine by SEC over Mini-Flash Crashes
Bank of America subsidiary fined over inadequate trading controls leading to market disruptions between 2012 and 2014.
An SEC investigation found that due to its "inadequate trading controls", Merrill Lynch failed to prevent erroneous orders being sent to the markets and causing mini-flash crashes, violating the Market Access Rule.
"Mini-flash crashes, such as those caused by Merrill Lynch, can undermine investor confidence in the markets," said Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC Enforcement Division. "It is essential that broker-dealers with market access have reasonable controls to prevent erroneous orders that disrupt trading."
The penalty, which the SEC states Merrill Lynch accepted "without admitting or denying the findings", is the largest to be imposed since a similar charge was brought against Knight Capital Americas ($12 million) in 2013.
In April last year, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed a fine of £13.2 million (approximately $19.8 million) on Bank of America Merrill Lynch International (MLI) for submitting more than 35 million incorrect trading reports and failing to report another 121,387 transactions between November 2007 and November 2014.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
As US options market continued its inexorable climb, ‘plumbing’ issues persisted
Capacity concerns have lingered in the options market, but progress was made in 2024.
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
