BoA Merrill Lynch Handed $12.5 Million Fine by SEC over Mini-Flash Crashes
Bank of America subsidiary fined over inadequate trading controls leading to market disruptions between 2012 and 2014.
An SEC investigation found that due to its "inadequate trading controls", Merrill Lynch failed to prevent erroneous orders being sent to the markets and causing mini-flash crashes, violating the Market Access Rule.
"Mini-flash crashes, such as those caused by Merrill Lynch, can undermine investor confidence in the markets," said Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC Enforcement Division. "It is essential that broker-dealers with market access have reasonable controls to prevent erroneous orders that disrupt trading."
The penalty, which the SEC states Merrill Lynch accepted "without admitting or denying the findings", is the largest to be imposed since a similar charge was brought against Knight Capital Americas ($12 million) in 2013.
In April last year, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed a fine of £13.2 million (approximately $19.8 million) on Bank of America Merrill Lynch International (MLI) for submitting more than 35 million incorrect trading reports and failing to report another 121,387 transactions between November 2007 and November 2014.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Ongoing uncertainty, volatility force new tech approach to collateral management
With market volatility and geopolitical uncertainty here to stay, Nasdaq’s Gil Guillaumey argues that firms must rethink their approach to collateral management.
What does it really mean to be a mid-tier OMS?
With Clearwater Analytics’ proposed $1.5 billion buy of Enfusion earlier this month, the market for order management systems appears to be evolving.
Agentic AI and big questions for the technologists
Waters Wrap: Much the same way that GenAI dominated tech discussions over the last two years, the road ahead will feature a lot of agentic AI talk—and CIOs and CTOs better be prepared.
Bloomberg offers auto-RFQ chat feed—but banks want a bigger prize
Traders hope for unfettered access to IB chat so they can build their own AI-enhanced trading tools
TMX launches ATS in US
The move represents the first expansion of the exchange group’s markets business outside of Canada.
AI co-pilot offers real-time portfolio rebalancing
WealthRyse’s platform melds graph theory, neural networks and quantum tech to help asset managers construct and rebalance portfolios more efficiently and at scale.
Opra considers ‘dynamic load balancing’ for options market
The data distributor recently completed a challenging project to build a 96-line feed. This new endeavor could prove just as challenging (but perhaps necessary) for the industry that will use it.
Big questions linger as DORA compliance approaches
The major EU regulation will go live tomorrow. Outstanding clarifications and confusion around the definition of an ICT service, penetration testing, subcontracting, and more remain.
