Numerix, Intel Publish New Threading Performance Benchmarks for CrossAsset
Co-developed study helps optimize running time, speed.
The study was conducted around CrossAsset's use of Intel's Threading Building Blocks (Intel TBB) Library, which users can deploy to easily write parallel programs taking full advantage of multicore performance, that are portable and composable, and that have future-proof scalability.
In leveraging the Intel's Xeon processor platform, Intel and Numerix worked together to optimize the performance of CrossAsset Analytics on an Intel Xeon processor based platform by vectorizing the core computational library.
As a result, this improved performance of CrossAsset Analytics by 1.78x by using Intel TBB memory allocator.
“The computational requirements imposed by the market and regulators are daunting. Even Smartphones don’t come in single-core CPU form any more, and every efficient computation engine needs to be able to take advantage of multiple cores,” says Ken Roller, global director of strategic relations at Intel. “The question has now become ‘how’, because in general there is no free lunch.”
Adds Steve Karmesin, SVP for Numerix CrossAsset infrastructure development: “Usually you can scale up in separate ‘processes’ on a single machine to keep the computations separate – the advantage being that they don’t interfere with each other, thus they scale up better. Or, you can scale up with multiple threads and get efficiencies by sharing data, but the computations can interfere with each other in multiple subtle ways, slowing down the computation. In leveraging the Intel TBB thread optimized memory allocation system we saw thread scaling much closer to the ‘process’ scaling, but with threads so we can also capture shared memory benefits.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.