Enterprise-wide Risk Management Special Report
Managing risk across the enterprise, especially when combining data from disparate systems, is a headache for all firms.
Click here to download a pdf of this special report
What Price Paradise?
To many risk managers, paradise looks a bit like this: You have a single risk management platform that supports every conceivable risk measure or activity across the entire business, allowing you to calculate and manage your potential risk exposure to a huge degree of granularity across asset classes, business units, geographies, counterparties, and even individual traders or portfolio managers at any given time around the clock.
The numbers this all-singing all-dancing paradise risk platform produces are as reliable as they are consistent, allowing risk managers and front-office staff to optimize their business decisions, secure in the knowledge that they are utilizing the organization's financial resources to the fullest extent without inadvertently exposing it to any unnecessary risk. Oh, and this system is data agnostic and has the constitution of an ox, which means it can consume, pro-cess, digest and regurgitate huge data quantities and varieties from across the capital markets spectrum as a matter of course.
The problem with paradise, though, is that it's out of reach for many capital market firms. In this context, paradise comes with an eye-watering price tag and a tendency to turn what appear to be fairly rudimentary projects at the outset into multi-year operational and technology quagmires, responsible for swallowing entire budgets year after year, while also stunting, or in some cases even terminating, careers.
But the above scenario is still an ideal toward which all capital markets firms ought to work. Sure, some will feel that their risk framework is sufficiently robust to adequately underpin the type of business they conduct, although those firms are in an ever-increasing minority, as asset owners, institutional investors and regulators are now less inclined than ever to turn a blind eye or give a provider the benefit of the doubt when they discover or even suspect risk management inadequacies.
Consequently, capital markets firms have little option but to start moving in an enterprise-wide risk management direction, irrespective of where they currently sit on that continuum. It's a journey not for the fainthearted, but with careful planning, numerous deliverables can be enjoyed along the way to the benefit of the wider organization. While the destination might seem unattainable, it's important to remember that much of its value is derived from the journey.
Victor Anderson
Editor-in-Chief, Waters
Click here to download a pdf of this special report
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project