TCorp Extends Numerix Implementation
Australian treasury adds enterprise analytics, reporting.
Already using Numerix CrossAsset for its debt risk management of client portfolios, TCorp has extended its relationship to include Numerix’s scalable server architecture, supported by a custom front-end and on-demand reporting framework.
The extension, which was built with seamless integration into TCorp's existing data warehouse, will further help provide clients with projections of expected interest costs as part of its debt management service. This includes interest cost attribution, interest payment forecasts and what-if scenarios, as well as debt interest forecast risk analysis and interest cost reports.
Forecasted Interest
Numerix analytics, meanwhile, will help the organization produce custom reports for forecast projections and present in pre-specified formats to TCorp end-clients. A range of reports can be generated to assess Interest Expense Forecasts, Portfolio Progression, Cashflow/Transaction Reporting, and Attribution Analysis. What-if Curve Reporting can be produced for quantifying the impact of market shifts and support multiple levels of aggregation and drill-down.
“As clients rely heavily on forecasted interest costs to assist with their budgeting process, it is crucial for TCorp to have a simple-to-use and intuitive tool that can be used conveniently to produce debt interest forecast reports to clients,” says Stephen Knight, CEO at TCorp.
“With Numerix’s high performance computing environment and custom analytics applications underpinning our debt management framework, we’ve implemented a robust best-practice risk management system for hedging decisions and risk management. We’re also able to provide clients with enhanced portfolio composition and interest cost projections, based on various market scenarios and assumptions.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.