TradingScreen Adds Eris Exchange
Move is first of its kind of for a broker-independent EMS
TradingScreen’s broker-neutral approach allows buy-side clients to route orders directly, either through broker FIX infrastructures of their choice or by selecting the “sponsored access” model for electronic execution of Eris Standard Swap Futures. Buy-side clients who prefer the flexibility and choice offered by non-conflicted providers will find this offering a cornerstone of their “best execution” strategy. TradingScreen is the first broker-independent EMS offering Eris products in the market, which also appeals to sell-side distribution giants like Morgan Stanley.
“Morgan Stanley’s clients are very interested in the changing liquidity profile of the interest rate market. Eris products for hedging and trading interest rate risk offer an additional tool for clients’ portfolio management,” says Joseph Sarcona, the bank's head of distribution for electronic rates trading. “Specifically, our clients using TradingScreen, can now access Eris futures on their multi-asset class trading platform.”
Adds TradingScreen CEO Philippe Buhannic, “TradingScreen is already the leader in independent centrally-cleared derivatives trading and aggregation for the buy-side as well as in algorithms across asset classes. The connection with Eris and the quality of its products reinforce what we offer and provides the large buy-side clients with a unique set of features that allow them to better handle a complex market infrastructure. We are very happy to participate in the development of Eris for the buy-side.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.