China Will Open Up, Just Not Yet
Stock Connect and fixed income lead this week’s coverage.
When talking to various people for that feature, I'd heard conflicting views ─ while most openly remained optimistic that it would be in place by the end of October, early November at the latest, privately many wondered if that would actually be the case, given how close we were at the time to that point.
I'd also heard murmurs that many brokers and buy-side firms, who stand to gain the most from it, weren't happy with the way that it was being handled. Not so much that there wasn't time, in that this was announced way back in April, and the vendors and custodian banks have been on a PR blitzkrieg to woo people over to their offerings. More so that they didn't want approval to drop one day, and have to be using it the next.
It all came to a head last week, when the Asian Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Asifma) sent a letter to the exchanges and regulators, expressing more or less that sentiment. Now it seems that, given we're at the bottom of the ninth for the supposed implementation, it won't be happening now. Late November, most are saying, but the Chinese regulators work at their own pace and won't be pressured or swayed in the same way that, perhaps, regulators from other economies can be. They're just not as collaboratively minded. Not to mention there's the small matter of widespread civil unrest in Hong Kong.
That being said, this is still a huge development for China generally, and for HKEx, which may emerge as the real winner in terms of initial public offerings and vastly increased business. Assuming, that is, people can get their acts together (according to HKEx in this FT article, there was never a formal timeframe in place, just vague notations about getting approvals).
But with most of the major issues ironed out ─ a question I posed to some sources about the settlement cycle received a couple of terse replies that it was all in hand, thank you very much ─ there's not a great deal of work remaining on the technical side, surely? I mean, come on, it's not like everyone would have left it to the last minute or anything.
The Chinese regulators work at their own pace and won't be pressured or swayed in the same way that, perhaps, regulators from other economies can be.
As a quick reminder, speaking of last-minute panicking, we have a number of webcasts, conferences and award events coming up over the next few months, in the build-up to the time of year that must not be named. If you're at any of these, or tuning in, please do come say hello.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.