Fingers Crossed for a Smooth Ride This Time

For some people, February was a relatively easy month. For others, particularly those running the communications apparatus for the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, it was less so.
Mandatory reporting, stemming from the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) came into force on February 12, requiring both sides of a derivative transaction to report details of the trade to trade repositories (TRs). It wasn't the smoothest ride, with many complaining about a lack of clarity regarding critical aspects of reporting, such as legal entity identifiers and unique trade identifers (UTIs) being thin on the ground, while problems at some TRs with onboarding delayed it even more.
Indeed, many of those problems still haven't been ironed out. A pathetically small amount of trades (around three percent for listed derivatives) are able to be matched at TRs, for a variety of reasons. Chief among this is the UTI, which can be generated by either side of the trade (although there is really supposed to be agreement) and thus can make lining up each individual report impossible. Some are more prosaic, such as using 'and' instead of ampersands in firm names. Either way, it's clearly a mess.
New Requirements
As such, today's implementation of enhanced reporting requirements inspires little in the way of confidence. Both counterparties are now requred to report the valuation of transactions and the attached collateral, along with the 80-plus fields of the previous requirements. The usual complaints abound about a lack of information, room for interpretation, but is it really the fault of the European Securities and Markets Authority (Esma)?
Not according to Esma, at least, if reports of a bad-tempered meeting in Paris a few weeks ago are any indication. According to journalists on the ground, Esma refused to provide additional clarification, saying that they'd done enough, and that when they issue guidance, they expect it to be followed.
According to journalists on the ground, Esma refused to provide additional clarification, saying that they'd done enough, and that when they issue guidance, they expect it to be followed.
Ouch.
It is a sign of a shift in attitude however, from accommodation through to frustration. Some regulators I speak to have sympathy with the industry, and say that they understand the technological struggle that things such as reporting involve. Others are less empathic, citing a streak of intransigence within the industry, and hearing the same arguments every time a rule is introduced.
Either way, reporting is here to stay. And while some home authorities such as the UK's Financial Conduct Authority have been notoriously lenient with firms to date, people shouldn't expect their patience to be limitless, either.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
A new data analytics studio born from a large asset manager hits the market
Amundi Asset Management’s tech arm is commercializing a tool that has 500 users at the buy-side firm.
How exactly does a private-share trading platform work?
As companies stay private for longer, new trading platforms are looking to cash in by helping investors cash out.
Accelerated clearing and settlement, private markets, the future of LSEG’s AIM market, and more
The Waters Cooler: Fitch touts AWS AI for developer productivity, Nasdaq expands tech deal with South American exchanges, National Australia Bank enlists TransFicc, and more in this week’s news roundup.
Inside the company that helped build China’s equity options market
Fintech firm Bachelier Technology on the challenges of creating a trading platform for China’s unique OTC derivatives market.
Experts say HKEX’s plan for T+1 in 2025 is ‘sensible’
The exchange will continue providing core post-trade processing through CCASS but will engage with market participants on the service’s future as HKEX rolls out new OCP features.
‘The opaque juggernaut’: Private credit’s data deficiencies become clear
Investor demand to take advantage of the growing private credit markets is rising, despite limited data, trading mechanisms, and a lack of liquidity.
Overnight trading blocked, consolidated tapes, BlackRock’s Larry Fink, data costs, and more
The Waters Cooler: Deutsche Börse provides crypto custody, FIS has a new GenAI tool, and some M&A activity in this week’s news round-up.